Welcome Guest

Cap and Trade (Dems 'solution' to Climate Change) support

Posted on: February 6, 2018 at 10:21:04 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146380
Member For:
21.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
nuclear plants. Get it?

Cap-and-trade would have penalized polluting power sources such as coal and gas emitters, thus tilting the playing field toward nuclear power. Department of Energy simulations of the ill-fated Waxman-Markey climate bill projected that it would have increased nuclear power generation by 74 percent in 2030.

Steven Chu, President Obama’s energy secretary, has been enthusiastic about the nuclear option. When asked to compare coal and nuclear energy in 2009, Chu responded: “I’d rather be living near a nuclear power plant.”
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Cap and Trade (Dems 'solution' to Climate Change) support - Spanky KU - 2/6 10:21:04
          As you know but merrily lie about - JG A - 2/6 10:46:55
               My post does not infer you are a Democrat. Read it and get - Spanky KU - 2/6 11:02:00
                    LOL Jesus Spanked - JG A - 2/6 11:03:08
                         No, George. Address my post factually if you can. - Spanky KU - 2/6 11:05:33
                              Nuclear energy is currently a problem not a solution - JG A - 2/6 11:08:06
                                   And Dems created the problem - Spanky KU - 2/6 11:16:08
                                        And yet again - JG A - 2/6 11:30:41
     Where is the "Republican socialism" in the article. They are - TigerMatt STL - 2/6 10:16:20
     RE: Republican socialism crumbles into dust - MOCO SON MU - 2/6 10:15:31
          Id much rather live next to that than a Nuke reactor plant - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/6 10:26:39




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard