Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The crux of the case is that the Feds prohibit it but have

Posted on: January 24, 2018 at 15:01:14 CT
hefeweizen MU
Posts:
124289
Member For:
10.19 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
no agency to regulate it. That goes against the Supremacy Clause because there is really no conflict with Fed law since there are no regs nor agency in place to regulate it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Legalized sports betting is closer to becoming a thing - Grasslands MU - 1/24 14:54:03
     National legalized gambling, weed, dogs and cats - HandBanana MU - 1/24 17:36:35
     Smart. (nm) - Tiger_Claw MU - 1/24 15:25:47
     They need to do it the proper way, which they won't do. - Evenflow MU - 1/24 15:05:09
          Not if the SCOTUS rules for NJ. Creating a new agency - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:09:21
               The argument against it from the sports leagues for decades - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 15:12:23
                    You can bet on UNLV games - Eggs MU - 1/24 15:24:28
                    yes, the leagues finally abandoned that ridiculous notion - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:14:41
     that'd be great although seems like MO would be on the - ajpe53 MU - 1/24 15:03:56
     hell yes(nm) - cnk ATL - 1/24 15:01:46
     as long as these hopheads arent taking the marijuana drug. - colonel angus beef KC - 1/24 15:01:01
          It has implications there too(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:01:42
               because of the implication?(nm) - cnk ATL - 1/24 15:04:02
                    Im sure the argument will be that the Fed does indeed - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:05:45
                         but they can say "no" right?(nm) - cnk ATL - 1/24 15:11:50
                              If 5 say the Supremacy Clause doesnt apply, sure. Better - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:13:10
                                   ROFL!! Now you’re blabbing on abkut the Law, lmafao!! - STL1DFW STL - 1/24 18:09:05
                                   RE: If 5 say the Supremacy Clause doesnt apply, sure. Better - cnk ATL - 1/24 15:14:27
                                        The implication... (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 15:16:20
                                             RE: The implication... (nm) - colonel angus beef KC - 1/24 15:20:56
                                   AND sports betting(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 15:14:02
                                        oooh, no. Congress should stay the **** out of it if - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:15:48
                                             I'm saying they could pass a bill to legalize it - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 15:17:07
                                                  Of course, a SCOTUS decision may be needed if it is - STL1DFW STL - 1/24 18:10:08
                                                  lol, and my aunt would be my uncle if she had balls(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:20:54
                    It's the implication of danger... (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 15:05:05
     The NBA is trying to get a 1% rake on all wagers. - Zeaux MU - 1/24 14:58:12
     SCOTUS will determine it this year I think(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 14:54:43
          They're ruling on the federal ban enacted by Congress - Grasslands MU - 1/24 15:12:13
          Yes, New Jersey case. Chris Christie is a party - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 14:56:29
               The crux of the case is that the Feds prohibit it but have - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:01:14
                    Surely it could relate to interstate commerce (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/24 15:05:46
                         Pretty sure that's not the argument that was made though. - hefeweizen MU - 1/24 15:07:58
                              ez solution, The Department of Gambing is your newest - 90Tiger MU - 1/24 16:00:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard