Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

So you don't want to answer the question

Posted on: November 13, 2017 at 17:39:45 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.94 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Great. The information provided said the correspondence was largely one sided and ignored by Trump Jr. Also, lets take a look at their requests: Trump’s tax returns, urging the Trump campaign on Election Day to reject the results of the election as rigged, and requesting that the president-elect tell Australia to appoint Julian Assange ambassador to the United States.. None of those happened.

If paying people to dig up dirt on a candidate is deemed "OK" (dossier), how would getting information from Wikileaks be any different?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Wow, Trump Jr. done ****ed up(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:32:33
     Silas, is that you? - MIZ45 MU - 11/13 18:52:30
     Heavy stuff... - MUTGR MU - 11/13 17:50:22
     How? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/13 17:33:03
          you watching the news?(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:34:01
               In think ive discovered yer problem boy - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/13 18:02:41
                    RE: In think ive discovered yer problem boy - TheShoe STL - 11/13 19:02:52
               No (nm) - Sal KC - 11/13 17:34:17
                    Trump Jr. corresponding with wikileaks during the campaign(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:35:29
                         Wikileaks corresponded with him... he ' mostly ignored the - Spanky KU - 11/13 18:23:42
                              Yup - Sal KC - 11/13 18:27:07
                         Is Wikileaks a foreign gov't? - Sal KC - 11/13 17:36:20
                              and here we go(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:37:39
                                   compelling thread, Shoe. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/13 17:42:57
                                        Trumpitis - Sal KC - 11/13 17:46:03
                                   Lol you so desperately want something to be here - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/13 17:40:45
                                        Our intelligence agencies still can't even prove - Sal KC - 11/13 17:42:44
                                             LOL - Badird MU - 11/13 17:44:16
                                                  wikileaks can prove it. but they have never revealed their - blake1771 KC - 11/13 17:47:35
                                                       Then why did they offer it up like it was the truth? - Badird MU - 11/13 20:33:21
                                                       They are Xpanding Mah Russia to wikileaks to try to cover - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/13 17:58:34
                                                       It's all Russia man - Sal KC - 11/13 17:50:31
                                                            Its all deflection from democrat collusion with Russia - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/13 17:54:29
                                                            it's not insignificant(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:53:53
                                                                 It actually is (nm) - Sal KC - 11/13 17:55:10
                                                                      I'll remind you of this when Oprah is President(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/13 18:01:59
                                                  I'm sure your post was supposed to make sense - Sal KC - 11/13 17:45:28
                                   So you don't want to answer the question - Sal KC - 11/13 17:39:45
                                        Sal - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:43:02
                                             No, the CIA BELIEVES Wikileaks worked with Russia - Sal KC - 11/13 17:44:43
                                                  C'mon man - TheShoe STL - 11/13 17:47:34
                                                       "Our intelligence community" re: The Deep State LOL - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/13 17:51:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard