Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Resonable limits are not an infringement.

Posted on: October 5, 2017 at 10:42:47 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146403
Member For:
21.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Limiting mentally ill access to weapons is REASONABLE. Limiting a private citizen from possessing a hand grenade is REASONABLE.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Thankfully the GOP supports the second amendment - El-ahrairah KC - 10/5 09:30:35
     A bump stock is not a weapon and not covered by the 2nd - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:37:42
          neither are 3D printers. Gonna need to ban those too(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:43:52
               Who is banning 3D Printers because they can - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:47:27
                    they can make guns and bump stocks. the bump stock - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:48:43
                         You didn't answer my question - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:49:45
                              Is your question can a 3D printer be used to make a gun - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:50:35
                                   Who is suggesting banning 3 D Printers? - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:53:22
                                        Nobody, yet. 3D printers can be used to make bump - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:54:23
                                             Possessing a bump stock can be made illegal. Selling - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:57:53
                                                  Oh for ****s sake. Shooting 59 people dead is illegal too - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:59:37
                                                       Why are your panties in a bundle? - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:00:32
                                                            Bc it is very frustrating dealing with someone as dumb as - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 10:01:03
                                                                 Because I asked a simple question about your post - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:03:04
                                                                      No, because you are dumb. very very dumb.(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 10:03:55
                                                                           RE: No, because you are dumb. very very dumb.(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:04:18
          Then the federal govt should pass laws banning triggers - ummmm MU - 10/5 09:41:28
               A trigger is a required part of a gun. A bump stock is not - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:49:06
                    A bump stock is a required part of a modified automatic - ummmm MU - 10/5 09:50:13
                         flame on. An automatic weapon is not legal to own - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:55:26
                              "shall not be infringed" (nm) - pickle MU - 10/5 10:07:30
                                   Resonable limits are not an infringement. - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:42:47
                                        There is nothing in the 2A that says "reasonable limits" - pickle MU - 10/5 12:23:37
                              Totally False(nm) - WrightWing MU - 10/5 10:01:32
                              And wait a second, you just said that the differentiating - ummmm MU - 10/5 09:57:08
                                   Nope.. there can (and are) be reasonable limits of the 2nd - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:01:44
                                        The only limitation in the 2A is "shall not be infringed" - pickle MU - 10/5 10:13:00
                                        Stop changing the subject. Did you just say that the - ummmm MU - 10/5 10:05:25
                                   Lol - El-ahrairah KC - 10/5 09:58:19
                              If I want a bump stock for my AR AFTER the ban, will - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:56:42
                                   Likely yes. Will it be illegal to possess it? Also likely - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:58:50
                                        ooooooh, it's illegal. That'll stop em. goddam you are an - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 10:00:32
                                             Maybe you should change your diaper and come back - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:04:02
                                                  will that make you not a dumbfvck?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 10:04:36
                              Stop running away from your interpretation of the Second - ummmm MU - 10/5 09:56:07
                                   Flame on. - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:59:39
                                        No, I'm not. I'm trying to get you to explain yours. - ummmm MU - 10/5 10:04:11
               It's really unbelievable - pickle MU - 10/5 09:42:54
                    Must do anything to defend the Republican party. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/5 09:44:34
                         When did Diane Feinstein switch parties? - Spanky KU - 10/5 09:52:19
                              Your initial response in this thread was to the OP article - ummmm MU - 10/5 09:58:35
                                   It is not their proposal.. Get it? - Spanky KU - 10/5 10:05:06
                                        Lol you are something else (nm) - pickle MU - 10/5 10:19:21
                                        That doesn't matter. They are supporting it. Which is the - ummmm MU - 10/5 10:06:17
                                             No.. the point was it was against the 2nd Amendment - Spanky KU - 10/5 11:22:35
                                             RE: That doesn't matter. They are supporting it. Which is the - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 10:06:36
                              already has R support. why? because it is easy and - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:53:39
     This was an easy preditction as soon as the bump stock news - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 09:36:38




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard