Welcome Guest

I don't know but performance wise there is no significant

Posted on: September 27, 2017 at 09:22:21 CT
Tiger_1995 MU
Posts:
4482
Member For:
7.81 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
difference in any of the shoes to justify their cost or loyalty to one brand. You have all the people wearing $160 basketball shoes that never step on a basketball court. For $160, I can buy damn good shoes (not sneakers) that would last many years.

Edited by Tiger_1995 at 09:28:44 on 09/27/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Together they sell 49 billion dollars in products - catbirdseat MU - 9/27 10:14:53
     I don't know but performance wise there is no significant - Tiger_1995 MU - 9/27 09:22:21
          Most people are robotic sheep and will do anything to - GA Tiger MU - 9/27 09:26:54
     i don't know DOC, tell us (nm) - phrejd MU - 9/27 09:18:07
          There's no way that's true. nm - TigerUppercut MU - 9/27 09:19:17
               you were correct. adidas surpassed jordan's line of shoes - ajpe53 MU - 9/27 09:23:06
                    Makes more sense. Adidas has heavily invested though nm - TigerUppercut MU - 9/27 09:25:42
               i probably got it wrong. looking for the article now(nm) - ajpe53 MU - 9/27 09:21:28




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard