I watched them both play, I recall both very clearly

Posted on: August 18, 2017 at 16:28:14 CT

Clark was an above avg penetrater and finisher at the rim, had a plus level pull up jumper and could create his own space, and was a lock down perimeter defender. He didn't have great range on his shot and he was more of a smaller shooting guard playing out of position as a pg and was even more miscast as a go to player. Probably his best attribute was his effort level.

Rivals had him as a four-star recruit, the No. 14 point guard in the nation and No. 72 player overall in the 2013 recruiting class.

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/college/mizzou/eye-on-the-tigers/backcourt-possibilities-excite-haith/article_28f88bfa-882b-5170-95b8-b3e4283d8c4d.html

Haith said Clarkson is “by far” the team’s best defender. The team’s runner-up in that department is Clark. Both guards will be on the floor together at times, with Clark at the point and Clarkson playing on the wing.

“Wes is very, very good,” Haith said. “There’ll be a lot of teams Wes would probably start for. "

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/twenty-under-the-radar-breakout-players-for-the-2014-15-season/

Wes Clark, Missouri: The Tigers have an awful lot to replace in the back court and that means Clark has one heck of an opportunity. The 6-1 point guard "got his feet wet" last year and averaged 20.4 minutes as a freshman but this season he'll be counted on to run Missouri's offense from tip to buzzer during Kim Anderson's first year as head coach in Columbia.

Edited by FIJItiger at 16:28:29 on 08/18/17