Welcome Guest

It's explicitly defined in the Constitution:

Posted on: July 17, 2017 at 09:29:28 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.46 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Article III, Section 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

He may be shocked but I'm certainly not. - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 08:32:19
     hey.. could you help me out and tell - SwampTiger MU - 7/17 08:44:56
          Not only am I not a constitutional scholar but - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 08:55:28
               It's explicitly defined in the Constitution: - ummmm MU - 7/17 09:29:28
                    Maybe the most INexplicit sentence in the constitution. - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 09:33:57
                         your ignorance is shining here (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/17 10:18:28
                         It's explicit - pickle MU - 7/17 09:55:30
                         You're focusing on the wrong part. - ummmm MU - 7/17 09:37:28
                              So that is explicit? Looks like it supports MY point. - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 11:20:05
               Why won't you answer questions? (nm) - pickle MU - 7/17 09:15:52
               you were confident enough to call me ignorant but now - SwampTiger MU - 7/17 08:59:31
                    What was the issue and question to which you refer?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 09:34:29
                         RE: What was the issue and question to which you refer?(nm) - pickle MU - 7/17 09:54:32
          I was just about to link to that (nm) - pickle MU - 7/17 08:49:37
     Even though it is liberal commentary--expect Townhall attack - mu7176grad MU - 7/17 08:39:11
     Trump is a con man. The Trump University fraud should - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/17 08:35:20
          None of which rebuts the article.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 08:36:13
               I was unaware of how talking about treason was against - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/17 08:38:47
                    straw man (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/17 08:50:37
                         read the article. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/17 08:57:54
                              i did (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/17 09:08:57
                    Did it say that talking about treason is against the law? - hokie VT - 7/17 08:45:21
                    Thanks for proving my point--attack the source - mu7176grad MU - 7/17 08:42:08
                         When the source is Sh*t, it's easy to do. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/17 08:45:43
                              Yet you are incapable of saying why it is. - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 08:51:16
                                   No. Just tired of having to do something that should - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/17 08:57:37
                                        YOU'VE NEVER DONE ANYTHING. Why are you tired. - GA Tiger MU - 7/17 11:18:52
                              Is Dershotwitz a POS ???---his quotes - mu7176grad MU - 7/17 08:50:17
                              If the exact same interview were on MSNBC it would - Floyd Turbo MU - 7/17 08:47:36
                                   It wouldn't be on MSNBC. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/17 08:58:36
                                        That wasn't the question. Pay closer attention(nm) - Floyd Turbo MU - 7/17 09:45:13
                                        Dershowitz is too good for MSNBC - mu7176grad MU - 7/17 09:22:17
                                             Derpowitz likes to legislate from the TV - JG A - 7/17 09:24:55




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard