 |
|
Your definition is simply wrong. It's not unequal.
Posted on: June 18, 2017 at 08:31:36 CT
RHAYWORTH MU
Posts:
44102
Member For:
16.08 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
The economy has already determined the value of goods and services. Those with more, have added more value, than those with less.
You seek to change that, to favor people you like in socialist wealth redistribution. Because being a brave socialist, you know better than society does about value.
Stealing with better marketing, is still theft.
You also ignore by making the jobs of those with more less valuable, you'll get far less of people you seek to steal from, while increasing those of far less valuable.
In the long run, you slowly destroy the economy , work ethic, all for your artificial version of "fairness".
We need more rich businesses, not more couch sitting losers playing video games and watching porn.
Nothing more ridiculous than socialists pretending they know how to run a capitalistic society.
Edited by RHAYWORTH at 08:36:08 on 06/18/17
You seek to change that, to favor people you like in socialist wealth redistribution. Because being a brave socialist, you know better than society does about value.
Stealing with better marketing, is still theft.
You also ignore by making the jobs of those with more less valuable, you'll get far less of people you seek to steal from, while increasing those of far less valuable.
In the long run, you slowly destroy the economy , work ethic, all for your artificial version of "fairness".
We need more rich businesses, not more couch sitting losers playing video games and watching porn.
Nothing more ridiculous than socialists pretending they know how to run a capitalistic society.
Edited by RHAYWORTH at 08:36:08 on 06/18/17
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Your definition is simply wrong. It's not unequal. - RHAYWORTH MU - 6/18 08:31:36If you're sick of gross stupidity, quit acting like a moron(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 6/17 18:50:30
-