Welcome Guest

RE: no. C is blake's words(nm)

Posted on: May 11, 2017 at 18:00:14 CT

blake1771 MU

Posts:

14478

Member For:

20.04 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

C is 1/2 mccabe's testimony as ALL of A & B are. the back 1/2 of C is a rational inference taken from the first part of C.

Edited by blake1771 at 18:00:57 on 05/11/17

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Many FBI agents were upset with Comey - Sal KC - 5/11 16:34:27

Bigly! Everyone is talking about it! - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 5/11 19:56:35

he didn't say many - gmmm98 MU - 5/11 17:12:01

No it's not - Sal KC - 5/11 17:39:12

proving my point(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 5/11 17:58:30

so A. many agents were ****ed (duh) about clinton email - blake1771 KC - 5/11 16:43:28

it really depends on what you read, where it's from, how - gmmm98 MU - 5/11 17:21:07

Those words are straight from McCabe (nm) - Sal KC - 5/11 17:38:19

exactly. it's from congressional testimony. there is no need - blake1771 KC - 5/11 18:03:53

anonymous sources are more reliable lol (nm) - Sal KC - 5/11 18:15:54

You will read what you want to see - gmmm98 MU - 5/11 18:34:56

no. C is blake's words(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 5/11 17:58:10

RE: no. C is blake's words(nm) - blake1771 KC - 5/11 18:00:14

A is irrelevant today. B is dependent on who - gmmm98 MU - 5/11 18:16:35