Welcome Guest

Becuase it was never needed

Posted on: May 3, 2017 at 14:19:03 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146286
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Nobody has ever made a strong case that the pre-Dodd-Frank framework failed, much less that a new federal agency was necessary to protect consumers. CFPB advocates act as though there would be no consumer protection in financial markets without this government agency, but that’s demonstrably false.

Dodd-Frank transferred enforcement of 22 specific consumer financial protection statutes from other agencies to the CFPB.


Prior to Dodd-Frank, federal rulemaking and enforcement for consumer financial protection laws were divided among seven agencies: the Federal Reserve Board of Governors; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; the Office of Thrift Supervision; the National Credit Union Administration; the Federal Trade Commission, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

States also had – and still have – their own consumer protection laws. And, the Department of Justice generally enforces anti-discrimination law when financial institutions are alleged to have perpetrated such crimes.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/norbertmichel/2017/01/24/the-cfpb-is-in-the-crosshairs-exactly-where-it-belongs/#3c3de7001a4f
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     How would the CFPB have prevented Bill Clinton from - MUTGR MU - 5/3 14:55:51
     Why is good to have an agency that reports to no one? - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/3 14:31:11
     Becuase it was never needed - Spanky KU - 5/3 14:19:03
          Good post, Sparky. Liberals would like to - hokie VT - 5/3 14:44:59




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard