 |
|
no, that would indicate spurious correlation
Posted on: April 25, 2017 at 18:45:08 CT
FootballRefugee MU
Posts:
91593
Member For:
22.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
unless a causal mechanism is known.
In fact, there's no correlation going back, and there isn't really much of one now. But that could be as a result of components of cause, like in a multiple regression. However, correlation is not proof of causation. Ever.
In fact, there's no correlation going back, and there isn't really much of one now. But that could be as a result of components of cause, like in a multiple regression. However, correlation is not proof of causation. Ever.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
no, that would indicate spurious correlation - FootballRefugee MU - 4/25 18:45:08