 |
|
Looks more like "antiscience" wants to ban beneficial
Posted on: April 20, 2017 at 11:45:57 CT
Alferd Packer MU
Posts:
50313
Member For:
26.25 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
pesticides in the name of "environment."
Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, said Dow's experts were trying to hold EPA scientists to an unrealistic standard of data collection that could only be achieved under "perfect laboratory conditions."
"unrealistic standard of data collection" means cheap, lazy and slovenly is "good enough for government work."
"You can't just take an endangered fish out of the wild, take it to the lab and then expose it to enough pesticides until it dies to get that sort of data," Hartl said. "It's wrong morally, and it's illegal."
Guessing is "good enough for government work." Besides, it gives the liberals the results they want in the first place.
Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, said Dow's experts were trying to hold EPA scientists to an unrealistic standard of data collection that could only be achieved under "perfect laboratory conditions."
"unrealistic standard of data collection" means cheap, lazy and slovenly is "good enough for government work."
"You can't just take an endangered fish out of the wild, take it to the lab and then expose it to enough pesticides until it dies to get that sort of data," Hartl said. "It's wrong morally, and it's illegal."
Guessing is "good enough for government work." Besides, it gives the liberals the results they want in the first place.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Looks more like "antiscience" wants to ban beneficial - Alferd Packer MU - 4/20 11:45:57