Welcome Guest

That's an interesting point. His legislative training

Posted on: April 20, 2017 at 09:41:03 CT

hokie VT

Posts:

68150

Member For:

9.66 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

may inspire debate that is non-judicial in nature.

That would be wrong. That would be a shame.

My preference for Cruz is because he has a great and logical mind. If he can keep it on the judicial track and not let it waiver into legislation, he could be very good.

Your point is noted.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

lol Drumpf may get to pick another Supreme - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/20 09:15:02

Dems want RBG to serve past death - mu7176grad MU - 4/20 09:22:12

pretty sure she already is - Butcher of Bakersfield STL - 4/20 09:34:35

Teddy Cruz - Emoji Man MSU - 4/20 09:17:26

That would be my choice as well. He has the temperament of a - hokie VT - 4/20 09:20:12

He's also a politician, so he'll fit right in with the third - ummmm MU - 4/20 09:36:24

lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/20 09:49:42

That's an interesting point. His legislative training - hokie VT - 4/20 09:41:03

He would have the less intelligent leftist judges completely - Emoji Man MSU - 4/20 09:24:38

The left meltdown of a Cruz nomination would be worth it (nm) - Sal KC - 4/20 09:20:47

😊 Imagine Chuckie Schumer and Diane Fienberg - hokie VT - 4/20 09:24:56