Merrick Garland, obviously
Posted on: April 6, 2017 at 11:17:36 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56577
Member For:
18.57 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and this is tit for tat for that very situation. It's not the equivalent of it, because that was a lame-duck nomination offered by a party that had previously claimed that Presidents shouldn't make them. Just shows you that they aren't to be believed.