Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Just one more huge tactical mistake by Dems

Posted on: April 4, 2017 at 10:18:34 CT
615Tiger STL
Posts:
19296
Member For:
14.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Running Hillary as their candidate, forming a far left progressive agenda, arguing for open borders and failing to place national security over their liberal voter drive, trying to undermine Trump's presidency at every turn, refusing to participate in the political process and obstructing for the sake of obstructing.

There will continue to be political costs related to the tactics of the Demlib party. They are so blind by their own idiocy they are unable to see it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Let's try this again - Sal KC - 4/4 09:56:42
     Pro Corp, Anti-Labor, Anti-Little Guy - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 10:20:17
          You're anti-labor and anti-little guy - pickle MU - 4/4 10:48:09
               Doesn't mean the Justice should be - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 10:55:03
                    Rask, you're an idiot (nm) - pickle MU - 4/4 12:14:14
     He's not - MrBlueSky MU - 4/4 10:16:04
     there is no argument against him - cnk ATL - 4/4 10:12:18
     There is none - El-ahrairah KC - 4/4 10:04:17
     Outside of being unprecendently partisan - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/4 10:00:32
          Always funny when a hypocrite rails against hypocrisy - JG MU - 4/4 10:24:36
          It may be the end of the US Senate - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 10:23:52
          Just one more huge tactical mistake by Dems - 615Tiger STL - 4/4 10:18:34
          Unprecedented??? - pickle MU - 4/4 10:07:50
               Name me another time this has happened - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/4 10:13:41
                    Merrick Garland - MrBlueSky MU - 4/4 10:18:27
                    Didnt garland get sat on - El-ahrairah KC - 4/4 10:15:18
                         No. - Spanky KU - 4/4 10:27:28
                         RE: Didnt garland get sat on - Silas MU - 4/4 10:17:01
               Yes it is. Never happen before. - Coors4bob MU - 4/4 10:10:03
     What is the case for Gorsuch? - Silas MU - 4/4 09:58:21
          I will answer. Long term judge that follows the law - tman KC - 4/4 10:13:16
               10,000 others out there also qualified. Why him? - Silas MU - 4/4 10:27:15
          That's not the question I asked - Sal KC - 4/4 10:08:27
               Because you asked the second question. Not the first. - Silas MU - 4/4 10:15:01
                    Then why don't the Democrats want to vote yes or no? - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:16:41
                         Why do Republicans want the votes from Democrats? Besides - Silas MU - 4/4 10:18:47
                              O...M...G.... Are you truly this misinformed?? DOH! - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:26:39
                                   If it doesn't need 60, why the discussion? - Silas MU - 4/4 10:28:33
                                        Perhaps you could educate yourself so you aren't so... - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:30:35
          The same case Democrats voted unanimously for in 2006... - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:04:18
               US District Judge, right? - Silas MU - 4/4 10:05:52
                    You need to explain that more. It's clearly, relevant. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/4 10:08:21
                    If he was so flawed why did Democrats vote unanimously? (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:07:05
                         US District Judge, right? - Silas MU - 4/4 10:08:21
                              You don't know? - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:11:14
                                   You don't get it, do you? Why am I not surprised? - Silas MU - 4/4 10:13:11
                                        It's obviously you that doesn't get it (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:15:35
          By every measure and account used historically - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/4 10:01:18
               So are about 10,000 other attorneys. So why him? - Silas MU - 4/4 10:04:45
                    Read his resume. It is very special. - Coors4bob MU - 4/4 10:09:08
                    Because he is the one the president nominated - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/4 10:06:49
                         Garland was nominated - Silas MU - 4/4 10:19:42
                              No, because dems wouldn't let bush nominate either. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/4 10:44:20
                              Time was too short so they didn't get to it (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:39:51
                    Because that is who the POTUS wants... - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:06:18
                         If POTUS wants to pull the plug in veterans benefits, we go - Silas MU - 4/4 10:07:20
                              Whatever you think, Scooter... (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 4/4 10:07:49




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard