Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No. There should just be much higher costs over

Posted on: March 29, 2017 at 12:33:46 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
252580
Member For:
26.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
an amount, probably a sliding scale, and let people decide if its worth it.

And by much I mean MUCH.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Should the government regulate the temp at which - tman KC - 3/29 12:10:04
     No. There should just be much higher costs over - GA Tiger MU - 3/29 12:33:46
          Do we factor in poor people have houses that are not likely - tman KC - 3/29 18:14:35
     They already pretty much do - JG MU - 3/29 12:17:25
          How is that regulating how much you can use?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/29 13:18:49
               How is it not? - JG MU - 3/29 13:29:17
                    RE: How is it not? - meatiger MU - 3/29 13:32:52
                         If a gallon of milk was 3 bucks and 2 gallons of milk is 6 - JG MU - 3/29 13:36:18
                              It is a pricing policy - meatiger MU - 3/29 13:42:14
                                   All utilities are socialist constructs - JG MU - 3/29 13:48:42
     in some instances, yes... - Badird MU - 3/29 12:13:40
          California restricted water to farms and residences so the - hokie VT - 3/29 12:20:42
          Not in any instance ever (nm) - pickle MU - 3/29 12:15:01
               Machine guns for all!! Tanks for all! - Badird MU - 3/29 12:16:48
                    No, you're making a logical fallacy - pickle MU - 3/29 12:33:30
                    you're doing the philosophy wrong and now the - 90Tiger MU - 3/29 12:17:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard