Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Sessions volunteered the information under oath, and

Posted on: March 12, 2017 at 21:12:43 CT
SparkyStalcup MU
Posts:
25359
Member For:
13.68 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
basically dodged the question Franken asked. Franken's question is immaterial to whether Sessions lied or not. Sessions also lied in the written answers he provided to Leahy. This is fact at this point...whether he gets prosecuted for it is beside the point
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Kremlin: Russian ambassador met with Clinton campaign also - Spanky KU - 3/12 19:30:08
     That's not what the article said - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/12 22:04:39
     Did she lie under oath about it to the Senate? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/12 20:50:35
          Yes!! She has lied many times under oath to the Senate!!(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 3/12 21:41:35
          Who lied under oath? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/12 20:53:29
               Sessions. And there's definitive evidence of that, so don't - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/12 21:01:18
                    No he didn't - Sal KC - 3/12 21:02:28
                         Sessions lied even by his own standards - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/12 21:06:02
                              No he didn't - Sal KC - 3/12 21:08:53
                                   Sessions volunteered the information under oath, and - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/12 21:12:43
                                        He didn't dodge his question - Sal KC - 3/12 21:17:30
                                             No. He didn't. - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/13 00:59:25
     Schumer and pelosi will certainly call for an investigation - hokie VT - 3/12 20:22:47
          If history is a guide, probably right.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/12 20:34:08
          Judicial Watch isn't waiting for the midterms - pfann4mizzou MU - 3/12 20:27:43
     this part ****es off the new neocon democrats: - 90Tiger MU - 3/12 20:11:57
     "would probably see"... Who? When? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:04:21
     So it was just business as usual - Sal KC - 3/12 19:31:40
          yep. Libs trying their damnest to make it out to something - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 19:40:22
               So why lie about the meetings? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:04:47
                    you mean democrats?(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:07:25
                         Nope. Trump's people. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:08:25
                              why did the dems lie about meeting the russian ambassador?(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:09:31
                                   Who? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:12:34
                                        Pelosi(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:18:39
                                        Claire for starters (nm) - Sal KC - 3/12 20:13:51
                                             Child adoptions? I doubt she remembered years ago. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:16:22
                                                  So you're claiming she didn't really have "meetings" - Sal KC - 3/12 20:18:25
                                                       I don't care if anyone "meets" with Russians. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:19:23
                                                            You obviously don't care about the lying portion - Sal KC - 3/12 20:20:35
                                                                 Who said they never met Russians? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:22:10
                                                                      Read this thread - Sal KC - 3/12 20:23:38
                                                                           That's pretty damn weak. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:27:43
                                                                                They set the bar for "meetings" - Sal KC - 3/12 20:29:03
                                                                                     Except they keep lying about them when asked. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:31:01
                                                                                          So did the democrats - Sal KC - 3/12 20:56:09
                                                                                               It's degrees. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 21:09:17
                                                                                                    It's not degrees - Sal KC - 3/12 21:20:15
                                                                                                         No, black and white thinking is for simpletons. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 21:43:24
                                                                                                              Lol whatever you need to tell yourself (nm) - Sal KC - 3/12 21:43:55
                                                                                                                   Either/or thinking is really stupid. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 21:47:08
                                                                                                                        "I hate lying ... unless it's my party" (nm) - Sal KC - 3/12 21:47:56
                                                                                                                             Yes, that would describe you. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 21:49:36
                                        Claire Bear(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:13:30
                                             So back to the Trump administration. Why lie? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:15:49
                                                  Obama arranged the meeting of Sessions with the ambassador. - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:21:48
                                                       Who arranged the phone call? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:23:38
                                                  Would you say a handshake is a formal meeting? - Sal KC - 3/12 20:17:44
                                                       Phone calls aren't "in passing". Why lie about them? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:18:35
                                                            Who are you referring to now? - Sal KC - 3/12 20:20:01
                                                                 Flynn for starters. And Sessions. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:21:31
                                                                      No they aren't - Sal KC - 3/12 20:22:56
                                                                           What was said then? "Ooops wrong number"? (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:24:31
                                                                                You are terrible at reading (nm) - Sal KC - 3/12 20:27:09
                                                                                RE: What was said then? "Ooops wrong number"? (nm) - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:25:00
                                                                                     I don't read fake news sites. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:28:25
                                                                                          Just curious- what do you consider "real" news sites?(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 3/12 20:31:44
                                                                                               Ones that hire Mizzou J-school grads. - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:56:31
                                                                                          You should have stopped after read (nm) - Sal KC - 3/12 20:29:37
                                                                                               Sad! (nm) - tigerspy MU - 3/12 20:31:18




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard