Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

my question was not sarcastic

Posted on: February 9, 2017 at 20:21:34 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
i sincerely doubt the ussc has EVER taken up a tro.

i don't recall the briefing schedule before the trial court, but i suspect it was expedited.

and, to be frank, i don't recall how many votes ussc requires to grant certiorari.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I see the 9th Circuit got all the liberal cockroaches... - Logan BAMA - 2/9 19:51:37
     Everybody knows they are a joke!(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 19:58:36
          how does it play out from here? - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 19:59:39
               Ultimately? Much more stringent immigration standards in - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:05:41
                    so trump scraps this order and starts over?(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:06:25
                         No order to scrap. They are currently working on the - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:09:07
                              Exactly. You just set the standards so high for - tman KC - 2/9 20:18:15
                                   that COULD be defensible - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:24:21
                                        Trump's Order wasn't but Clinton ordering Elian - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:43:23
                                        It is legal and yes I know what the 9th circuit said - tman KC - 2/9 20:28:22
                                             once again. in english, please.(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:30:27
                                   Yep! Not be capable or willing to meet them is what - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:22:58
                              what about the orders that extend past 90 days? - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:11:26
                                   Clarify?(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:14:50
                                        5(e) of the order(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:18:50
                                             Case by case basis for refugees notwithstanding 120 day - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:28:53
                                                  RE: Case by case basis for refugees notwithstanding 120 day - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:34:11
                                                       RE: Case by case basis for refugees notwithstanding 120 day - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:46:03
                                                            RE: Case by case basis for refugees notwithstanding 120 day - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 21:01:36
               Already told you. A 9 person SC goes back to real law, - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:02:00
                    Even with the current 4, Kagan could definitely side with - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:07:02
                         what are the odds the ussc takes this up - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:10:07
                              Emergency hearing of the Supreme Court - See: - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:12:26
                                   was that a tro?(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:13:11
                                        No, but the same stands. I was referencing Procedure... - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:17:24
                                             my question was not sarcastic - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:21:34
                                                  I was not being sarcastic. See S. CRT. Rule 11 & the - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:34:44
                    so affirmed. got it.(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:03:17
     I would imagine that you're used to cockroaches in - tigerdb MU - 2/9 19:54:02
          I have a cockroach hotel ready for you. Lol (nm) - Logan BAMA - 2/9 19:57:46
     If only raid would do it. Maybe if we could - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 19:52:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard