Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yup. But I suspect they would not define hate speech.

Posted on: February 9, 2017 at 09:51:09 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68169
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
They would say it is nasty and unlawful, and leave it for anyone who is offended to define it.

Affectively negating free speech.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Would freedom of speach still be included in the constituion - tman KC - 2/9 09:07:22
     Today's leftist would have laws like Europe's where anything - DHighlander KC - 2/9 09:38:25
          Yup. But I suspect they would not define hate speech. - hokie VT - 2/9 09:51:09
     Of course, they love protesting. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 2/9 09:15:49
          No. they love trying to block hate speech.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/9 09:16:21
               That's because they love to hear themselves talk. - tigerspy MU - 2/9 09:18:34
     Neither would the 2nd Amendment nor the 10th - Spanky KU - 2/9 09:09:26
     just like europe - SuperTone MU - 2/9 09:08:00




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard