Welcome Guest

NAFTA...23 years ago (not last 10); is a 3 country deal wh

Posted on: February 2, 2017 at 15:07:09 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163449
Member For:
23.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ich you would call "exclusionary". that isn't a free trade agreement and it isn't in the last 10 yaers.

Ross Perot was right:

U.S. presidential candidate Ross Perot argued in 1992 that trade liberalization would lead to a “giant sucking sound” of U.S. jobs fleeing across the border.

Mexican unemployment also rose, which some economists have blamed on NAFTA for exposing Mexican farmers, especially corn producers, to competition from heavily subsidized U.S. agriculture. A study led by CEPR economist Mark Weisbrot estimates that NAFTA put almost two million small-scale Mexican farmers (PDF) out of work, in turn driving illegal migration to the United States. (Migration to the United States, both legal and illegal, more than doubled after 1994, peaking in 2007. However, the flow reversed after 2008 as more Mexican-born immigrants began leaving the country than arriving. Experts attribute this to stricter border enforcement, changing demographics in Mexico, and the combination of fewer available jobs in the United States along with more in Mexico.)
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If Trump starts a trade war against china - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:29:23
     Like placing a Tariff on Chinese solar panels and those - Spanky KU - 2/2 15:58:14
     what is a trade war? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 14:31:10
          That means china's slave laborers don't get paid and - catbirdseat MU - 2/2 14:34:11
               I'll take the version which includes how Trump starts - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 14:47:03
                    Our "just in time" supply, manufacturing and distribution - catbirdseat MU - 2/2 14:53:35
                         China will gladly look elsewhere - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:56:58
                              They can do that? - catbirdseat MU - 2/2 15:03:02
                                   You think China isn't going to do that if the US does - what - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 15:08:14
                                        China will eat our lunch - catbirdseat MU - 2/2 15:23:15
                                             again, who is starting a trade war and more importantly - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 15:46:08
                                                  If TPP had moved forward - meatiger MU - 2/2 15:47:50
                                                       and? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 16:30:41
          the cards and cubs did that years ago with Lou Brock(nm) - ajpe53 MU - 2/2 14:32:14
     Killing TPP was supported by the dems btw (nm) - TheWildcat STL - 2/2 14:30:00
          By the far left Dems - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:31:31
               lol - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 14:32:05
                    When one side - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:33:27
                         so the US is in trade wars currently then (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 14:47:45
                              To some extent yes - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:49:13
                                   10 years? try 20+ NAFTA and the China policy during - hefeweizen MU - 2/2 14:51:16
                                        fine 20+ years - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:52:49
                                   examples? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 14:50:07
                                        NAFTA, Korean free trade agreement - meatiger MU - 2/2 14:52:08
                                             NAFTA...23 years ago (not last 10); is a 3 country deal wh - 90Tiger MU - 2/2 15:07:09
                                                  Nafta is virtually revenue neutral - catbirdseat MU - 2/2 15:27:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard