Welcome Guest

What they campaigned on is irrelevant

Posted on: February 1, 2017 at 06:30:35 CT
Butcher of Bakersfield STL
Posts:
21051
Member For:
10.85 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
And it is dishonest to say he did when he clarified he was talking about a temporary ban. You are being disingenuous at best. The courts don't rule on what people campaign on. They rule on specific wording of law or policy and the executive orders are explicit.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     It's immoral (nm) - pickle MU - 2/1 08:53:43
     It's not. Just like how they thought it wasn't when - MIZ45 MU - 2/1 07:21:18
     the initial application was clearly unlawful - gmmm98 MU - 2/1 06:08:01
          false - unclear and not specific enough for proper - 90Tiger MU - 2/1 08:31:49
          No it wasn't. - SuperTone MU - 2/1 06:40:54
               the application of the order, you dumb****(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/1 06:46:22
                    no (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/1 08:32:10
                    no it wasn't. (nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/1 06:51:41
          What they campaigned on is irrelevant - Butcher of Bakersfield STL - 2/1 06:30:35
     they suck - FootballRefugee MU - 2/1 02:15:44
     It's just today's Hands Up, Dont Shoot(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 01:21:34
     Kinda like Russians behind Trump winning. There is more - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 00:11:18
          RE: Kinda like Russians behind Trump winning. There is more - JangoFett MU - 2/1 07:17:51




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard