 |
|
Will Trump follow thru on this promise?
Posted on: January 10, 2017 at 08:12:55 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
251279
Member For:
25.70 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I say no. Staff will talk him out of it. I can't stand gutless.
Trump Can Keep Campaign Promise To Jail Hillary, Save NYC At Same Time
President-elect Donald Trump told Hillary Clinton during their second debate that she'd "be in jail" if he was in charge of the law. He's not in charge of the law, nor will he be, and if Clinton is convicted she'd go to prison, not jail, a subtlety lost on most anyone who hasn't been a cop reporter.
But his overall point was not lost.
At that October debate, he said if elected he would "instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation," which centered around Clinton's private email account handled by a nonsecure server in her Chappaqua home — likely an attempt to evade freedom of information laws — and the way she used her position as secretary of state to enrich her family's Clinton Foundation.
It would be within his authority to do that. Indeed, it would be his duty.
Unfortunately, Trump said a couple of weeks after his election that he was not inclined to appoint a special prosecutor as Clinton "went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." While some would say he was showing mercy, it's a decision he might one day regret.
Keeping his campaign word could possibly save New York City — his city — from yet another mayor who would prolong the Sandinista ruin being overseen by its current mayor.
Like so many others whose lifelong goal is to run other people's lives, Clinton apparently isn't done meddling. She has been mentioned as a possible candidate for mayor of New York City. Maybe even the next mayor. John Gizzi of Newsmax says that a former elected New York City Democrat has admitted that "she's talking about it."
New York City just might have to do if she can't run the country and satisfy her all-consuming thirst for power on a national scale. It would be too hard for someone whose life is driven by the urge to invade and control the private affairs of others to stay out of "public service" for too long.
Media reports indicate Clinton is being recruited by the party to challenge Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio in the election later this year, because the Revolutionary Mayor's performance has caused some dissatisfaction inside the Democratic Machine.
His administration has been under state and federal investigations, the New York Post reports, and the headaches caused by panhandlers, potholes, vagrancy, vandalism, and gridlocked traffic are apparently more painful than when de Blasio took office.
Given that de Blasio was Clinton's campaign manager when she first ran for the Senate in 2000, she might not want to run against him.
But the Clintons are loyal only to themselves and the predatorily ambitious Hillary might be happy to leave boot marks on de Blasio's political carcass to get another crack at ruling a village.
New York City just might have to do if she can't run the country and satisfy her all-consuming thirst for power on a national scale. It would be too hard for someone whose life is driven by the urge to invade and control the private affairs of others to stay out of "public service" for too long.
While Clinton would be a better mayor than de Blasio, the improvement could be measured in single-digit micrometers. Yes, de Blasio has the radical's background and the Marxist sympathies to match. But Clinton is no liberator. She would bring her own left-wing toxins with her into office. The city's path to a full-on socialist welfare would continue uninterrupted.
Trump could save the city — and the foolish, impulsive New Yorkers who would put her office, as she is wildly popular there, says Gizzi — from a future much like its crumbling present.
At the same time, he'd make sure that justice caught up to the Clintons. It would be late, but that's, as the saying goes, better than never.
Trump Can Keep Campaign Promise To Jail Hillary, Save NYC At Same Time
President-elect Donald Trump told Hillary Clinton during their second debate that she'd "be in jail" if he was in charge of the law. He's not in charge of the law, nor will he be, and if Clinton is convicted she'd go to prison, not jail, a subtlety lost on most anyone who hasn't been a cop reporter.
But his overall point was not lost.
At that October debate, he said if elected he would "instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation," which centered around Clinton's private email account handled by a nonsecure server in her Chappaqua home — likely an attempt to evade freedom of information laws — and the way she used her position as secretary of state to enrich her family's Clinton Foundation.
It would be within his authority to do that. Indeed, it would be his duty.
Unfortunately, Trump said a couple of weeks after his election that he was not inclined to appoint a special prosecutor as Clinton "went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." While some would say he was showing mercy, it's a decision he might one day regret.
Keeping his campaign word could possibly save New York City — his city — from yet another mayor who would prolong the Sandinista ruin being overseen by its current mayor.
Like so many others whose lifelong goal is to run other people's lives, Clinton apparently isn't done meddling. She has been mentioned as a possible candidate for mayor of New York City. Maybe even the next mayor. John Gizzi of Newsmax says that a former elected New York City Democrat has admitted that "she's talking about it."
New York City just might have to do if she can't run the country and satisfy her all-consuming thirst for power on a national scale. It would be too hard for someone whose life is driven by the urge to invade and control the private affairs of others to stay out of "public service" for too long.
Media reports indicate Clinton is being recruited by the party to challenge Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio in the election later this year, because the Revolutionary Mayor's performance has caused some dissatisfaction inside the Democratic Machine.
His administration has been under state and federal investigations, the New York Post reports, and the headaches caused by panhandlers, potholes, vagrancy, vandalism, and gridlocked traffic are apparently more painful than when de Blasio took office.
Given that de Blasio was Clinton's campaign manager when she first ran for the Senate in 2000, she might not want to run against him.
But the Clintons are loyal only to themselves and the predatorily ambitious Hillary might be happy to leave boot marks on de Blasio's political carcass to get another crack at ruling a village.
New York City just might have to do if she can't run the country and satisfy her all-consuming thirst for power on a national scale. It would be too hard for someone whose life is driven by the urge to invade and control the private affairs of others to stay out of "public service" for too long.
While Clinton would be a better mayor than de Blasio, the improvement could be measured in single-digit micrometers. Yes, de Blasio has the radical's background and the Marxist sympathies to match. But Clinton is no liberator. She would bring her own left-wing toxins with her into office. The city's path to a full-on socialist welfare would continue uninterrupted.
Trump could save the city — and the foolish, impulsive New Yorkers who would put her office, as she is wildly popular there, says Gizzi — from a future much like its crumbling present.
At the same time, he'd make sure that justice caught up to the Clintons. It would be late, but that's, as the saying goes, better than never.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Will Trump follow thru on this promise? - GA Tiger MU - 1/10 08:12:55
-