Seems i was mistaken about sara. I thought he may

Posted on: December 31, 2016 at 10:08:41 CT

be the one (or at least one of a very few) lib on this board with whom it is possible to have a debate that is both coherent and civil.

That of course requires a level of intellect, integrity and wisdom that few libs possess, and regrettably, sara is in the "have not" category.

While he has shown flashes of the maturity and wisdom to carry on a conversation or debate with someone with whom he disagrees, he more often than not sinks to the level of the raskol and offers only superficial responses, often incoherent, in which he addresses only peripheral issues or hijacks the thread altogether.

Occasionally, it takes multiple sentences to make a point, put it in context and address the issue put forward. That is obviously not something sara is capable of doing on a consistent basis.

The post below is a case in point. I have no idea what he was talking about when he posted below, "This is what our state department always wanted and the CIA will pursue that goal it doesn't matter what he wants" (Um, try some punctuation.) After a couple of "Huh?" responses he eventually came up with a slightly less incoherent response.

And we can count on sara to end many posts with "you're an idiot," or with the mention that he has other conservative friends who aren't ridiculous.

I suggest that if sara has conservative friends they or he, or both are very lonely people and will be friends with anyone. Or, his "conservative" friends are conservative in the same way JG is conservative. And the same way bruce jenner is a woman.

Self identified, self obsessed and delusional.

Cue the libs to begin, "Oh yeah, well you are a .... and you said.... and you don't know anything, and ....."

Blahblahblah....