In your assessment this is a wacky conspiracy theory, which
Posted on: December 6, 2016 at 09:49:16 CT
RayKinsella1922 SEC
Posts:
26857
Member For:
9.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
is why you try to discredit it by inventing what you consider to be similarly wacky, discreditable 'facts'.
And that is why you fail.
You have to take on the actual evidence and defuse it, one item at a time.
Something like 'Building 7 was constructed using a special pre-fabricated steel frame with notched intersects. In the trade, construction crews took to calling these 'lincoln log jobs' both because of the nature of the kits and the propensity of partially assembled frames to collapse. Demiurge Steel, the maker o f the kits, filed for bankruptcy in 1987 after losing a suit over a collapsed office building in Honduras. The company claimed the Honduran government had falsified the rating of the quake, claiming it was 3.7 on the richter scale. Using information from a local LandSat station manned by Stanford University students and sponsored in part by USGS, the quake was recorded at 8.1 on the richter scale, beyond the limit in the builder's contract. This information was disallowed by the Honduran court and Demiurge lost the case. The use of this kit is credited with the 'organized collapse' of building 7.'
Something like this. It's an explanation.
Right now we got: 'Dat bilding falled down too.'
Not wholly adequate is it?
Edited by RayKinsella1922 at 09:56:04 on 12/06/16