 |
|
He's hardly proven his argument, and he's provided little
Posted on: December 4, 2016 at 23:39:58 CT
SparkyStalcup MU
Posts:
25359
Member For:
13.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
evidence. He has provided a lot of circular reasoning.
First, he hasn't proven that God exists.
Second, he claims that there is no objective reference point for morality without a deity, but accepts without evidence that the deity is an objective reference point. That's very convenient for him.
The animal argument is laughable.
Good and bad are human constructs, and they existed long before humans believed there were deities.
Belief in a deity is subjective by its very nature. Belief in a deity requires faith where there is no evidence that the deity exists. There is no objective evidence for the existence of a deity.
First, he hasn't proven that God exists.
Second, he claims that there is no objective reference point for morality without a deity, but accepts without evidence that the deity is an objective reference point. That's very convenient for him.
The animal argument is laughable.
Good and bad are human constructs, and they existed long before humans believed there were deities.
Belief in a deity is subjective by its very nature. Belief in a deity requires faith where there is no evidence that the deity exists. There is no objective evidence for the existence of a deity.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
He's hardly proven his argument, and he's provided little - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/4 23:39:58