Welcome Guest

I suppose that qualifies as data

Posted on: November 18, 2016 at 18:57:06 CT

zodiac6 JC

Posts:

83015

Member For:

24.08 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

but it has nothing to do with the strength of the schedule as a whole.

Playing 10 NCAA teams and 20 ranked in the 300s is still a weak schedule compared to 6 NCAA teams and 24 ranked in the 75-150 range.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

KA should have scheduled like MA used to (nm) - TheLegend MU - 11/18 16:54:34

Mike's 16-16 '08 team played - FIJItiger MU

- 11/18 16:59:26

How many of those teams made the NCAA tournament? - BOILERTIGER MU

- 11/18 17:12:47

Well they were not powerhouses like UMKC. - sharpwp UNC - 11/18 19:01:30

Four of them - quicksand MU - 11/18 17:32:52

how does that compare to last season's teams? - morry KC - 11/18 17:37:52

We played only two non-conference NCAA teams last year - quicksand MU - 11/18 17:44:09

I don't know, but unless your scheduler is - FIJItiger MU

- 11/18 17:19:03

But he puts together some dog schedules (nm) - TheLegend MU - 11/18 17:12:34

True. But this yr and last yr are the easiest schedules - FIJItiger MU

- 11/18 17:20:39

You have any actual data to support that? - zodiac6 JC - 11/18 17:25:08

Sure. Last yr we played a combined total of 6 games - FIJItiger MU

- 11/18 17:32:39

I suppose that qualifies as data - zodiac6 JC - 11/18 18:57:06

I would argue the former is a much tougher schedule and - FIJItiger MU

- 11/18 18:59:35

You can argue whatever you want. In this case, though, - zodiac6 JC - 11/18 19:14:11

How many #1 teams Mizzou plays - haeffb MU - 11/18 18:58:55

The discussion should be non conference though (nm) - TheLegend MU - 11/18 17:39:27