Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Not necessarily. They could be wrong too(nm)

Posted on: November 7, 2016 at 09:20:16 CT
hefeweizen MU
Posts:
123694
Member For:
10.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Fox has the hag +4. (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 11/7 09:17:41
     Trump is favored 61-30 with whites without a college degree - Salty Dog MU - 11/7 09:41:58
          yes - FootballRefugee MU - 11/7 10:13:39
               Won't make a difference - raskolnikov MU - 11/7 10:17:59
          You really like that stat(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/7 10:13:10
     RE: Fox has the hag +4. (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/7 09:32:19
     LA Times has Trump up 5.(nm) - Alferd Packer MU - 11/7 09:22:15
          The LA Times doesn't even believe the LA Times poll - TigerJackSwartz MU - 11/7 09:23:20
               The LA Times/USC uses different methodology than other polls - Salty Dog MU - 11/7 09:44:06
               The arc is didferent than a generic poll but good response(nm) - tman KC - 11/7 09:37:28
               it is very odd(nm) - tmcats KSU - 11/7 09:32:02
     stock market rallies(nm) - tmcats KSU - 11/7 09:21:25
     Which means it would be a blowout(nm) - tman KC - 11/7 09:19:18
          Not necessarily. They could be wrong too(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 11/7 09:20:16
     rigged (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 11/7 09:18:05




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard