Welcome Guest

Thanks. That's the first article I've seen that made valid

Posted on: November 3, 2016 at 13:26:25 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72172
Member For:
21.41 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
criticisms of that poll.

I think it does, however, also show that the margin of error in perhaps all other polls that use weighting and algorithms to make up for too small a sample size is probably significantly larger than they indicate.

I've seen polls released over the same time frame that had very large differences from each other, but both claimed a much smaller margin for error than that discrepancy.

North Carolina http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-north-carolina-president-trump-vs-clinton

Trump +7
SurveyUSA/WRAL
Oct 28 – Oct 31
659 Likely Voters

Clinton +7
SurveyMonkey
Oct 26 – Nov 1
1,617 Likely Voters

FLORIDA http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-florida-presidential-general-election-trump-vs-clinton

Clinton +8
TargetSmart/William & Mary
Oct 25 – Oct 30
718 Likely Voters

Trump +4
Remington Research Group (R)/Axiom Strategies
Oct 30 – Oct 30
989 Likely Voters
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Clear manipulation of polling data. - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/3 12:58:25
     The voter mix is wrong, by a lot. - Coors4bob MU - 11/3 15:17:41
     Lmfao - pickle MU - 11/3 13:02:32
     Manipulation of polling data...best example... - Scipio Da Manus MU - 11/3 12:59:25
          Link? & a detailing of how the poll was manipulated, please(nm) - JeffB MU - 11/3 13:02:22
               RE: Link? & a detailing of how the poll was manipulated, please(nm) - mizzou alum 93 MU - 11/3 13:09:28
                    Thanks. That's the first article I've seen that made valid - JeffB MU - 11/3 13:26:25
          That's a national poll, not just CA voters(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 11/3 13:01:44




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard