Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The acquittal was on their use of weapons. The prosecution

Posted on: October 28, 2016 at 09:27:26 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144791
Member For:
20.81 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
3
failed to prove the INTENT of the Bundys was to use the weapons in violation of the law.

Having a personal weapon on government land is not (in and of itself) illegal.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Poor little jg - TIGERROAR MU - 10/28 08:44:02
     Any day without justice is a rough day - JG A - 10/28 09:34:42
     They're still in jail. - Toger STL - 10/28 09:17:39
          "tasted his a$$"? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 09:22:01
               :-) - Toger STL - 10/28 09:23:38
     lol saw that, we will be on DEFCON alert all day(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/28 08:47:28
     Jury nullification is one of the last lines of defense - ummmm MU - 10/28 08:47:16
          Bunch of whackjobs - JG A - 10/28 09:33:40
               It is 100% about gvmt overreach - pickle MU - 10/28 09:41:23
          how do you know this was jury nullification? - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 08:55:07
          a not guilty verdict does not mean 'jury nullification' - Spanky KU - 10/28 08:54:13
               your inability to think beyond the literal is showing again - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 09:11:21
                    Why do you think this was jury nullification and not simply - Spanky KU - 10/28 09:15:45
                         Spanky, no offense, but I don't really care enough to - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 09:19:05
                              You cared enough to insult me. Scurry away again like the - Spanky KU - 10/28 09:24:15
                                   Just curious... - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:24:47
                                        It matters not a whit to me. - Spanky KU - 10/28 09:28:18
                                             So you're indifferent? (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 09:37:07
                                                  No. - Spanky KU - 10/28 09:59:53
                                                       But you just said you were (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 10:04:20
                                                            Read my words... - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:24:09
                                                       I think you meant "yes" - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:01:35
                                                  He wants to be happy about it - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:39:57
                                                       An acquittal does not mean jury nullification - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:01:04
                                                            That's not even remotely at issue in this thread. - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:02:43
                                                                 You are claiming THIS is a jury nullification example - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:27:48
                                                                      LOL. - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:29:10
                                                                           No.. it actually is a perfect example of your 'logic' - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:38:33
                                                                                My position is this: - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:43:44
                                                                                     You have no EVIDENCE it was jury nullification - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:53:36
                                                                                          Spanky, you are frankly dumb. - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:01:31
                                                                                               Yes.. your argument is poor. - Spanky KU - 10/28 12:09:52
                                             Why did you post a story about it last night? (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:32:38
                                                  Because George was so convinced these guys - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:02:06
                                                       You don't sound indifferent. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:08:52
                              nice laydown. (nm) - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:20:18
                         Because it was thought to be an "open and shut case" - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:18:29
                              The acquittal was on their use of weapons. The prosecution - Spanky KU - 10/28 09:27:26
                                   You don't even know the charges they were acquitted on. - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:31:54
                                        "through intimidation, threat or force " means a weapon - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:37:52
                                             No, it doesn't - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:42:22
                                                  Yes.. it does. - Spanky KU - 10/28 10:54:29
                                                       (a) you don't know that - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:02:19
                              that does not, in any way whatsoever, prove the jury - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:19:55
                              i.e., they knew they were breaking the letter of the law - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 09:19:44
                                   Exactly (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 09:32:37
                                   Clear as it comes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:24:11
                                   appeal to omniscience fallacy. you don't knw what the jury - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:20:48
                    His inability to think is showing again (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 09:12:47
                         please provide evidence from a juror that this was an - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:14:52
               What verdict would be an indication of nullification? (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 09:04:02
                    are all not guilty verdicts jury nullification? - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:05:12
               That is how jury nullification manifests itself - ummmm MU - 10/28 08:56:35
                    that is horrible logic. you do you a link to a juror - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 08:58:57
                         Feds have very high conviction rate. - Evenflow MU - 10/28 09:04:24
                              yes and that would be a reason for the not guilty verdict. - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:06:01
                                   One defendants lawyer said 'you can count on being - Evenflow MU - 10/28 09:08:43
                                        There was also this from Spanky's article posted last night: - ummmm MU - 10/28 09:11:06
                                             They let him testify for like 10 hours, I think I read. (nm) - Evenflow MU - 10/28 09:21:16
                                             and that proves jury nullification how? - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:12:44
                                        it happens. - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:09:19
                                             I bet he would have fired you first. - Evenflow MU - 10/28 09:11:11
                                                  that makes no sense at all - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:11:48
                                                       It makes no sense that your lawyer would fire you - Evenflow MU - 10/28 09:19:09
                                                            Lol - pickle MU - 10/28 09:24:17
                                                            correct. - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/28 09:21:35
     JG was definitely wishing for a death sentence. - Evenflow MU - 10/28 08:46:07
          So much so they are willing to ignore the law the facts - JG A - 10/28 09:37:07




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard