Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

He has absolutely no claim against the NYT...

Posted on: October 13, 2016 at 14:15:46 CT
Scipio Da Manus MU
Posts:
409
Member For:
9.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He's a public figure and this case is completely incredible in the sense that we have the evidence of the truth before we have evidence of the claim.

If he really wants to have a proctology exam in front of the whole country about his sexual proclivities, he should sue.

I'm guessing he'll quietly not follow through.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The NY Times' attorneys throw down on Donny. - StaleyTiger MU - 10/13 14:13:08
     Wow! If those women aren't being truthful, he just set NYT - MIZ45 MU - 10/13 14:16:24
          The NY Times isn't Breitbart. You can be pretty much - StaleyTiger MU - 10/13 14:21:07
               RE: The NY Times isn't Breitbart. You can be pretty much - MIZ45 MU - 10/13 14:23:20
     He has absolutely no claim against the NYT... - Scipio Da Manus MU - 10/13 14:15:46
          Correct: free speech - pickle MU - 10/13 14:20:13
               Well, here on Earth we have NYT v. Sullivan... - Scipio Da Manus MU - 10/13 15:17:27
               No.. not protected by the 1st Amendment. That only limits - TigerMatt STL - 10/13 14:22:06
                    I'm not talking first amendment or government (nm) - pickle MU - 10/13 14:26:28
                         That is fine, but that isnt under the context a lawsuit - TigerMatt STL - 10/13 14:27:50
                              Like a couple of retards fighting over cheese... - Scipio Da Manus MU - 10/13 15:18:33
                              Even under that context (nm) - pickle MU - 10/13 14:36:20
     Have they reported on the substance of the emails yet?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/13 14:13:53




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard