Welcome Guest

no, he was not. you obviously didn't read the second

Posted on: October 13, 2016 at 09:00:42 CT

mizzou alum 93 MU

Posts:

15246

Member For:

13.32 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

link. the polling at this time had a slight reagan lead. trump is down. "but even if 2016 underwent a similarly sized lurch towards trump, he'd still lose."

Edited by mizzou alum 93 at 09:03:08 on 10/13/16

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Today's rasmussen has Trump back in front - SuperTone MU

- 10/13 08:24:34

RE: Today's rasmussen has Trump back in front - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/13 08:46:40

not quite. Reagan was down similarly at same point.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 10/13 08:59:42

no, he was not. you obviously didn't read the second - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/13 09:00:42

nope. Reagan was down 6%.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 10/13 09:06:19

no, he was not. at this time in october of 1980 he had - mizzou alum 93 MU - 10/13 09:07:14

I did hear last night that the first post debate polls had - hefeweizen MU

- 10/13 08:25:51

the cycle has been repeated like 5 times now... - SuperTone MU

- 10/13 08:28:30

Given the email revelations that prove media colusion - hefeweizen MU

- 10/13 08:30:15

according to the podesta hack yesterday - SuperTone MU

- 10/13 08:38:33