Welcome Guest

4 Pollsters the Same Raw Data. Reached Different Conclusions

Posted on: September 20, 2016 at 10:29:20 CT
Webbster MU
Posts:
5035
Member For:
23.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Interesting stuff. Goes to show it's far from fool proof.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/20/upshot/the-error-the-polling-world-rarely-talks-about.html

Nate Silver rates
Marquette: A
Echelon Insights: NR
Berland: B-
Stanford University/Columbia University/Microsoft Research: NR
NYT Upshot/Siena College: A
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

4 Pollsters the Same Raw Data. Reached Different Conclusions - Webbster MU - 9/20 10:29:20
     Why do you keep using them in your posts then. - Logan BAMA - 9/20 11:07:15
          It's not a science but it is a gauge - Webbster MU - 9/20 11:39:41
     Not many believe polls are an exact science - Spanky KU - 9/20 10:45:12
          I would agree. The other thing is that technology has - MIZZOU_FANATIC MU - 9/20 11:34:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard