 |
|
Not that we needed it but irrefutable proof that Rask is
Posted on: September 14, 2016 at 13:30:46 CT
hefeweizen MU
Posts:
121217
Member For:
9.40 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
a liar when he said he wasnt voting for the hag
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14093280
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14093280
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Not that we needed it but irrefutable proof that Rask is - hefeweizen MU - 9/14 13:30:46