Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

When I say try to address the article, I mean to take

Posted on: September 10, 2016 at 22:16:53 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
something from it and say that you believe it to be wrong and show why you believe it to be wrong.

I know you are capable of spouting off general tidbits you read in a Krugman op-ed. I wasn't looking for more of that.

Here are some follow ups, and I apologize in advance but they will cause you to form your own thoughts off the cuff:

What came before negative rates? High rates?

How are rates still too high? How do you make that determination? What do you believe causes them to be too high?

How much fiscal expansion do you believe is warranted?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Negative Rates Will Kill Growth - ummmm MU - 9/10 21:26:36
     It's welfare. Same result with corporate leaders as tenant - 90Tiger MU - 9/10 23:00:51
     Still waiting on that hyperinflation Schiff predicted - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 21:28:57
          I no longer see any hyperinflation, at least - GA Tiger MU - 9/10 21:31:45
               I'd like to see some higher inflation..that would be - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 21:47:39
                    Japan has been using ultra low interest rates and government - JeffB MU - 9/10 22:47:45
                         They also raised consumption taxes 3 times - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 23:15:21
          For once, try to address this article - ummmm MU - 9/10 21:30:58
               OK, so if interest rates are artificially low, where is the - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 21:37:57
                    Just because interest rates are artificially low does not - ummmm MU - 9/10 21:51:05
                         Also, like I said before, try to address the article - ummmm MU - 9/10 21:57:13
                              Yawn. Try accepting an answer for once even if it's not - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 22:00:14
                                   The article is about negative rates killing growth - ummmm MU - 9/10 22:03:04
                                        Growth was dead before negative rates came along - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 22:07:41
                                             Near zero interest rates for years 'is still too low'? (nm) - JeffB MU - 9/10 23:08:31
                                                  Yes, because the natural interest rate is negative, and zero - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 23:16:41
                                                       How do you come up with what should be 'natural interest' - JeffB MU - 9/10 23:19:13
                                                            Where is inflation? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 23:20:20
                                                                 You did not answer the question. (nm) - JeffB MU - 9/11 13:05:24
                                                                 it's everywhere - pickle MU - 9/10 23:53:57
                                             When I say try to address the article, I mean to take - ummmm MU - 9/10 22:16:53
                                                  I refer you to my previous answer. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 23:21:02
                                                       Your previous answer is inadequate. (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/11 09:02:14
                    Many people want rates to rise. LIke, all those people - GA Tiger MU - 9/10 21:41:36
                         Indeed. But all rising rates would do is exacerbate private - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/10 21:45:52
                              You're the most knowledgeable idiot here, Sparky. - 90Tiger MU - 9/10 23:02:35
                              No, it would choke off additional indebtedness - ummmm MU - 9/10 21:54:02




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard