 |
|
I think the false premise may be yours. Upon what basis
Posted on: September 9, 2016 at 16:22:15 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72172
Member For:
21.41 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
have you decided that animals cannot consent?
There was a story awhile back that got animal rights people all upset. A mother had asked her adult son to dog sit for her and he found some videos of her having sex with the dogs. He turned her into the police.
Per the story they had to put the dogs down because they were so sexualized that they tried to hump every human that came near. They said that it was too ingrained in them and they had to kill them all despite the outcry from the animal rights people who said that the dogs had done nothing wrong.
The bottom line is that nothing was forced on the dogs. They loved it.
Now you can make up your own definition of consent and say that the dogs don't have human reason and therefore cannot consent, but that is just your own opinion, not any sort of objective fact. You certainly cannot impose your morality on someone else can you?
Or would you support a right or even a duty for the State to outlaw bestiality? Would you favor laws that would put people in cages for having consensual sex with their animals?
Of course those questions might be better answered by pickle, since you say that you are not in reality an anarchist. It's too bad that he runs and hides from such questions so consistently.
There was a story awhile back that got animal rights people all upset. A mother had asked her adult son to dog sit for her and he found some videos of her having sex with the dogs. He turned her into the police.
Per the story they had to put the dogs down because they were so sexualized that they tried to hump every human that came near. They said that it was too ingrained in them and they had to kill them all despite the outcry from the animal rights people who said that the dogs had done nothing wrong.
The bottom line is that nothing was forced on the dogs. They loved it.
Now you can make up your own definition of consent and say that the dogs don't have human reason and therefore cannot consent, but that is just your own opinion, not any sort of objective fact. You certainly cannot impose your morality on someone else can you?
Or would you support a right or even a duty for the State to outlaw bestiality? Would you favor laws that would put people in cages for having consensual sex with their animals?
Of course those questions might be better answered by pickle, since you say that you are not in reality an anarchist. It's too bad that he runs and hides from such questions so consistently.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
I think the false premise may be yours. Upon what basis - JeffB MU - 9/9 16:22:15