Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

yes, did you? donations to sitting presidents wouldn't

Posted on: September 7, 2016 at 07:58:32 CT
SuperTone MU
Posts:
128107
Member For:
23.53 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
be allowed either yet they were. this is goldman sachs using perceptions as plausible deniability. It isn't required by law.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Goldman Sachs bans employees from donating to Trump - SuperTone MU - 9/7 07:01:22
     That would seem to be illegal - not that we are - GA Tiger MU - 9/7 07:41:18
          It's all about being in compliance with the law - Zamboni STL - 9/7 07:51:39
               And "the law" says what?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 9/7 07:53:22
                    RE: And "the law" says what?(nm) - Zamboni STL - 9/7 07:55:00
                    it says nothing that zamboni is implying. campaign donation - SuperTone MU - 9/7 07:54:41
                         Do you even read the articles you post?(nm) - Zamboni STL - 9/7 07:55:32
                              yes, did you? donations to sitting presidents wouldn't - SuperTone MU - 9/7 07:58:32
               no it isn't. They don't have to create company rules - SuperTone MU - 9/7 07:52:32
     RE: Goldman Sachs bans employees from donating to Trump - Zamboni STL - 9/7 07:37:40




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard