Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It was the FIRST case involving Judicial Review by SCOTUS

Posted on: September 6, 2016 at 14:30:58 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144763
Member For:
20.80 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
How is that not the case that established Judicial Review by SCOTUS?

Edited by Spanky at 14:31:07 on 09/06/16
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

No need to stop drunk drivers in Pickletopia - Spanky KU - 9/6 10:41:45
     I've driven while drunk, in my youth, and probably - GA Tiger MU - 9/6 12:02:00
          "no one at that age should be drivign while drunk" - meatiger MU - 9/6 12:12:26
               RE: "no one at that age should be driving while drunk" - meatiger MU - 9/6 12:12:40
          no-one any age should be driving drunk - Spanky KU - 9/6 12:08:05
     Nobody in their right mind condones impaired driving. And - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 10:52:49
          People are not arbitrarrilly stopped for DUI - Spanky KU - 9/6 10:58:41
               It happens by the thousands every weekend all across America - DHighlander KC - 9/6 11:19:26
                    Actually..they are not "random" - meatiger MU - 9/6 12:14:40
                         and cops must follow very specific rules for actually - Spanky KU - 9/6 12:19:19
                              Cops could follow very specific rules in confiscating guns - ummmm MU - 9/6 12:25:11
                                   If they were confiscating guns from felons, it would be - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:54:51
                                        No, I mean all people. They could do that by a set of very - ummmm MU - 9/6 14:08:25
                                             Like taking sawed off shotguns from people they - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:21:22
                                                  No, all people, all guns. - ummmm MU - 9/6 14:25:58
                                                       It is a hyperignorant - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:31:48
                    They check for more than that - Spanky KU - 9/6 11:29:36
                    They check for more than that - Spanky KU - 9/6 11:24:13
                         and that doesn't make it less unconstitutional - ummmm MU - 9/6 11:44:47
                              I guess you don't know the meaning of the word - Spanky KU - 9/6 12:02:24
                                   Sure I do. It means not a part of the Constitution. - ummmm MU - 9/6 12:24:22
                                        Can you show me the part that is being violated? - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:03:12
                                             First of all, you have the incorrect approach - ummmm MU - 9/6 13:15:30
                                                  Wrong.. What part of the Constitution is being violated? - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:18:14
                                                       Hence my statement about any reasonable and - ummmm MU - 9/6 13:23:18
                                                            nice example of an appeal to omniscience fallacy. (nm) - mizzou alum 93 MU - 9/6 15:03:38
                                                            The Supreme Court is the reasonable and - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:29:09
                                                                 That doesn't say anything about the power to interpret - ummmm MU - 9/6 13:34:02
                                                                      this statement show a surprising ignorance of history.(nm) - mizzou alum 93 MU - 9/6 15:04:14
                                                                      Sure it does.... - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:43:02
                                                                           John Marshall didn't even use that section. - ummmm MU - 9/6 13:44:06
                                                                                Yes.. Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:50:45
                                                                                     That is not what he based his decision on, in fact - ummmm MU - 9/6 14:02:04
                                                                                          Wrong. - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:16:35
                                                                                               That's not even remotely responsive to this subthread - ummmm MU - 9/6 14:20:21
                                                                                                    Wrong.. The case that you claim established judicial review - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:22:26
                                                                                                         As unsurprising as this is, you are not following the - ummmm MU - 9/6 14:25:36
                                                                                                              It was the FIRST case involving Judicial Review by SCOTUS - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:30:58
                                                                                                                   he's ignorant. - mizzou alum 93 MU - 9/6 15:06:03
                         The foot in the door was the public safety issues created by - DHighlander KC - 9/6 11:30:38
                              Yep... Public safety is their primary job. - Spanky KU - 9/6 11:33:33
               People are arbitrarily stopped to prove they aren't - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 11:00:01
                    They are public safety checkpoints - Spanky KU - 9/6 11:32:35
                         And that makes it better how? Because it now has - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 11:50:29
                              They do ask that now... - Spanky KU - 9/6 12:23:11
                                   Im going to the bar to drink 6 or 7 beers - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 13:33:22
                                        Nope. Perfectly legal. - Spanky KU - 9/6 13:53:34
                                             And what right would they to detain have if I said - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 14:00:14
                                                  Nothing... nor would they detain you over that. - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:19:59
                                                       Is there any reason at all you would find stopping - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 14:29:23
                                                            Yes. - Spanky KU - 9/6 14:32:34
                                                                 LOL! - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 9/6 14:36:36
                                        He has no problem with it whatsoever - ummmm MU - 9/6 13:43:19
                         Also problematic and unconstitutional for that reason (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/6 11:44:02
          except 90Tigs. - Spanky KU - 9/6 10:57:39
     question for you - meatiger MU - 9/6 10:46:55
     In "pickletopia" (whatever that means), there is no - ummmm MU - 9/6 10:43:46
          not quite. In pickeltopia, driving while drink is a welcome - SuperTone MU - 9/6 10:45:15
               No it is not. (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/6 10:47:05
                    yes it is. He has been clear about that before. - SuperTone MU - 9/6 10:49:18
                         Can you post a link where pickle welcomes and celebrates - ummmm MU - 9/6 11:09:41
                              just use the search button. it is an infringement upon - SuperTone MU - 9/6 11:41:57
                                   It is an infringement upon rights to arrest, detain, fine - ummmm MU - 9/6 11:43:43
                                        is it an infringement on rights to arrest, detain, fine, - mizzou alum 93 MU - 9/6 12:54:16




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard