 |
|
No, kc is the smallest. GB part of Milwaukee & it's a
Posted on: August 13, 2016 at 17:29:57 CT
STL1DFW STL
Posts:
56617
Member For:
16.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
much bigger market compared to kc.
Size of market obviously has nothing to do with having an NFL team, ask STL, Houston & LA (3 times), when the only reason a team relocates was due to only an owner's decision.
That just doesn't make sense, when tiny markets like kc & GB, as you note, compared to those cities have not lost an NFL team, though we know kc has lost plenty of pro franchises.
It's all about other factors.
STL will be fine with NFL expansion on the horizon & committed local ownership!
Edited by STL1DFW at 17:30:35 on 08/13/16
Size of market obviously has nothing to do with having an NFL team, ask STL, Houston & LA (3 times), when the only reason a team relocates was due to only an owner's decision.
That just doesn't make sense, when tiny markets like kc & GB, as you note, compared to those cities have not lost an NFL team, though we know kc has lost plenty of pro franchises.
It's all about other factors.
STL will be fine with NFL expansion on the horizon & committed local ownership!
Edited by STL1DFW at 17:30:35 on 08/13/16
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
No, kc is the smallest. GB part of Milwaukee & it's a - STL1DFW STL - 8/13 17:29:57