 |
|
No reason to play Woods or Smith over Jackson
Posted on: August 7, 2016 at 19:02:42 CT
MUIntensity USA
Posts:
21858
Member For:
21.92 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I'd go lean and mean:
Phillips, Walton, CVL, Jackson and Puryear, with Hughes first off bench playing equal time to CVL and Walton.
In December, Phillips, Walton, Barnett, Jackson and Puryear, with Hughes and CVL first off bench.
We need to go with our strength, which is athleticism. We're going to play 10-12 guys a night, but we don't need to play a big just to play a big. Our opponents are going to get points in the paint. We need to beat them with pace, offense, and athleticism.
Phillips, Walton, CVL, Jackson and Puryear, with Hughes first off bench playing equal time to CVL and Walton.
In December, Phillips, Walton, Barnett, Jackson and Puryear, with Hughes and CVL first off bench.
We need to go with our strength, which is athleticism. We're going to play 10-12 guys a night, but we don't need to play a big just to play a big. Our opponents are going to get points in the paint. We need to beat them with pace, offense, and athleticism.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
No reason to play Woods or Smith over Jackson - MUIntensity USA - 8/7 19:02:42