I assume it's related to someone we were actively recruiting
Posted on: August 2, 2016 at 21:15:06 CT
zodiac6 JC
Posts:
83015
Member For:
23.55 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
At that point, Gant had already been committed here for four months and signed for one.
Not sure who we were recruiting at the time that could be a better fit. Perhaps it's related to Cam Biedscheid's transfer if there were concerns about tampering. Maybe Ahmed Hill (friends with Gant and discussed as a potential package).