 |
|
Why the confrontational tone & the strong accusations
Posted on: July 28, 2016 at 11:26:37 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
73503
Member For:
21.75 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
based upon speculation on your part?
His was the first story I saw, I didn't read 'factual ones', but then select one where the author 'lied'.
Even if it turned out that his facts are wrong, and in fact your own assumptions may be wrong, you have no way of knowing if he was just relaying errors that were made by others, or had accidentally misread or misinterpreted things, or typed them out of order, etc.
But it looks to me as if the woman's original lawsuit alleges exactly what he said:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2996966-Doevelpasohospdist-Filed.html
29. Ms. Doe was commanded to lean backwards in her crouched position. She again complied. One of the agents then parted Ms. Doe’s vulva with her hand, pressed her fingers into
Ms. Doe’s vagina and visually examined her genitalia with a flashlight.
30. Ms. Doe did not consent to this strip search nor to having her body touched in so intimate a way by government agents. Ms. Doe was understandably humiliated and she began
crying.
31. The agents instructed Ms. Doe to get dressed. The strip search did not produce any evidence of contraband or of internal drug smuggling. Still, agents Portillo and Herrera
sealed the cuffs of Ms. Doe’s pants by taping her pants to her legs. The Searches Continued Without Consent, a Warrant, or Even Sufficient Suspicion of Criminal Activity
32. At approximately 4:00 p.m., CBP agents Portillo and Herrera forcibly transported Ms. Doe in handcuffs to the University Medical Center of El Paso. One of the agents informed Ms. Doe that they needed to monitor her bowel movement...
His was the first story I saw, I didn't read 'factual ones', but then select one where the author 'lied'.
Even if it turned out that his facts are wrong, and in fact your own assumptions may be wrong, you have no way of knowing if he was just relaying errors that were made by others, or had accidentally misread or misinterpreted things, or typed them out of order, etc.
But it looks to me as if the woman's original lawsuit alleges exactly what he said:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2996966-Doevelpasohospdist-Filed.html
29. Ms. Doe was commanded to lean backwards in her crouched position. She again complied. One of the agents then parted Ms. Doe’s vulva with her hand, pressed her fingers into
Ms. Doe’s vagina and visually examined her genitalia with a flashlight.
30. Ms. Doe did not consent to this strip search nor to having her body touched in so intimate a way by government agents. Ms. Doe was understandably humiliated and she began
crying.
31. The agents instructed Ms. Doe to get dressed. The strip search did not produce any evidence of contraband or of internal drug smuggling. Still, agents Portillo and Herrera
sealed the cuffs of Ms. Doe’s pants by taping her pants to her legs. The Searches Continued Without Consent, a Warrant, or Even Sufficient Suspicion of Criminal Activity
32. At approximately 4:00 p.m., CBP agents Portillo and Herrera forcibly transported Ms. Doe in handcuffs to the University Medical Center of El Paso. One of the agents informed Ms. Doe that they needed to monitor her bowel movement...
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Why the confrontational tone & the strong accusations - JeffB MU - 7/28 11:26:37