Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Weight isn't necessarily the key, unless too light

Posted on: July 19, 2016 at 14:00:40 CT
Diamond Dave MU
Posts:
82159
Member For:
25.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Bailey's the one I'm most interested in, as he seems to have some nastiness about him. He cannot play at around 280 though.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

O line weight - MizzouTCB MU - 7/19 13:46:31
     Both of the OTs are massive beasts, so there's that... - EdensRemorse SMS - 7/19 15:45:02
          Whiff monster. That's funny. Mitchell and Harris fight - Diamond Dave MU - 7/19 17:35:47
     Seems as though the last depth chart I saw had older weights - Diamond Dave MU - 7/19 13:54:20
          Thx! This will help me sleep better... - MizzouTCB MU - 7/19 13:59:08
               Weight isn't necessarily the key, unless too light - Diamond Dave MU - 7/19 14:00:40
                    Agreed. Not the key, but Some of those guys seemed lite. - MizzouTCB MU - 7/19 14:02:24
                         How about Brantley? 200 last summer. I'm 205 - Diamond Dave MU - 7/19 14:04:59
          10 years ago we barely had one over 300. (nm) - TheWildcat STL - 7/19 13:55:47
               Here's the '98 team - Diamond Dave MU - 7/19 13:59:33
                    RE: Here's the '98 team - TGismyhero MU - 7/20 00:59:50
                    2001 (Pinkel's first team) had OTs weighing 325/345. - zodiac6 JC - 7/19 16:10:22




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard