|
| Members of Mizzou's 1000-Point Club |
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Chievous, Derrick 84-85 32 28 1019 31.8 142 278 0.51 134 168 0.80 170 5.3 79 1 44 71 2 33 418 13.1 11.8
Chievous, Derrick 85-86 34 29 1091 32.1 227 433 0.52 186 232 0.80 262 7.7 80 1 49 77 6 35 640 18.8 18.7
Chievous, Derrick 86-87 34 34 1215 35.7 282 522 0.54 244 302 0.81 291 8.6 75 0 65 92 3 39 821 24.1 24.5
Chievous, Derrick 87-88 30 25 943 31.4 242 477 0.51 200 261 0.77 256 8.5 66 3 49 45 3 45 701 23.4 25.0
Chievous, Derrick Career 130 116 4268 32.8 893 1710 0.52 764 963 0.79 979 7.5 300 5 207 285 14 152 2580 19.8 20.0
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Smith, Doug 87-88 30 16 792 26.4 145 288 0.50 48 75 0.64 197 6.6 98 3 72 56 34 29 338 11.3 14.1
Smith, Doug 88-89 36 35 975 27.1 217 455 0.48 67 91 0.74 250 6.9 122 4 88 87 25 41 502 13.9 14.6
Smith, Doug 89-90 32 32 942 29.4 260 462 0.56 115 161 0.71 295 9.2 103 3 64 86 28 44 635 19.8 21.8
Smith, Doug 90-91 30 30 1051 35.0 275 553 0.50 156 190 0.82 311 10.4 99 4 96 106 42 64 709 23.6 28.0
Smith, Doug Career 128 113 3760 29.4 897 1758 0.51 386 517 0.75 1053 8.2 422 14 320 335 129 178 2184 17.1 19.4
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Peeler, Anthony 88-89 36 9 801 22.3 130 258 0.50 89 118 0.75 134 3.7 79 0 102 95 8 34 362 10.1 10.9
Peeler, Anthony 89-90 31 30 1031 33.3 184 413 0.45 130 169 0.77 168 5.4 76 0 179 90 15 63 522 16.8 23.8
Peeler, Anthony 90-91 21 17 725 34.5 134 282 0.48 116 151 0.77 131 6.2 51 0 104 74 3 37 408 19.4 23.5
Peeler, Anthony 91-92 29 28 1026 35.4 218 475 0.46 187 232 0.81 160 5.5 72 1 112 101 10 62 678 23.4 24.6
Peeler, Anthony Career 117 84 3583 30.6 666 1428 0.47 522 670 0.78 593 5.1 278 1 497 360 36 196 1970 16.8 20.0
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Stipanovich, Steve 79-80 31 31 1034 33.4 180 301 0.6 85 127 0.7 199 6.42 107 4 66 80 15 11 445 14.4 13.3
Stipanovich, Steve 80-81 32 28 970 30.3 143 286 0.5 120 162 0.7 237 7.41 104 3 60 71 44 16 406 12.7 14.3
Stipanovich, Steve 81-82 31 31 956 30.8 140 278 0.5 79 104 0.8 248 8 97 6 42 76 34 21 359 11.6 12.5
Stipanovich, Steve 82-83 34 34 1264 37.2 246 454 0.5 134 187 0.7 300 8.82 103 4 67 89 56 21 626 18.4 20.6
Stipanovich, Steve Career 128 124 4224 33 709 1319 0.5 418 580 0.7 984 7.69 411 17 235 316 149 69 1836 14.3 15.3
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Booker, Melvin 90-91 30 25 856 28.5 89 205 0.4 51 76 0.7 66 2.2 57 1 105 46 6 31 248 8.27 11.3
Booker, Melvin 91-92 30 30 996 33.2 124 261 0.5 53 69 0.8 114 3.8 76 4 118 69 4 29 348 11.6 14.1
Booker, Melvin 92-93 33 33 1157 35.1 164 374 0.4 143 175 0.8 142 4.3 88 3 122 83 3 46 522 15.8 17.1
Booker, Melvin 93-94 32 32 1114 34.8 189 375 0.5 135 164 0.8 121 3.78 88 2 143 86 2 41 579 18.1 20.2
Booker, Melvin Career 125 120 4123 33 566 1215 0.5 382 484 0.8 443 3.54 309 10 488 284 15 147 1697 13.6 15.8
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Thames, Kelly 93-94 32 31 946 29.6 146 284 0.5 94 129 0.7 228 7.13 101 2 38 54 16 20 391 12.2 12.1
Thames, Kelly 95-96 32 29 933 29.2 142 311 0.5 119 154 0.8 169 5.28 79 1 74 79 10 22 406 12.7 12.2
Thames, Kelly 96-97 32 32 936 29.3 144 314 0.5 127 167 0.8 195 6.09 90 2 48 63 7 26 417 13 11.8
Thames, Kelly 97-98 32 32 1035 32.3 153 347 0.4 155 198 0.8 193 6.03 94 3 50 69 6 31 475 14.8 12.9
Thames, Kelly Career 128 124 3850 30.1 585 1256 0.5 495 648 0.8 785 6.13 364 8 210 265 39 99 1689 13.2 12.3
PLAYER Yr GP GS MIN AVG FG FGA PCT FT FTA PCT REB AVG PF FO A TO BLK S PTS AVG NEP
Stewart, Norm 53-54 21 94 263 0.4 68 93 0.7 - - 65 256 12.2 -
Stewart, Norm 54-55 21 131 288 0.5 88 106 0.8 186 8.9 61 350 16.7 14.9
Stewart, Norm 55-56 21 184 464 0.4 138 188 0.7 224 10.7 59 506 24.1 19.7
Stewart, Norm Career 63 409 1015 0.4 294 387 0.8 - - 208 1112 17.7 -
Note: The available stats did not differentiate between offensive and defensive rebounds. The NEP calculation used here assumed all rebounds were defensive. The actual NEP would be somewhat higher for each player, depending on the ratio of offensive to total rebounds.