Should there be presidential sanctions short of impeachment
Posted on: July 19, 2025 at 09:35:56 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68279
Member For:
9.70 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
for the president of the united states?
Libs/morons, this is a hypothetical exercise and i know how those frighten you. You may leave.
Suppose that your favorite president, one whom you admire, respect and support without reservation is caught on camera at a small private fundraiser. The president is very drunk and has been brazenly pursing a woman at the event. He has groped her and forcibly kissed her against her will. She walks toward her husband to get away from potus.
POTUS then sucker punches the husband and knocks him cold and goes back to fondling the woman as secret cervix agents try to usher the president away.
It is on video.
It is undeniable.
It is irrefutable.
It is uncontestable.
Both the woman and her husband are willing to press charges.
Should we endure high minded speeches proclaiming that NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW and begin impeachment proceedings?
Should we listen to unbelievable excuses by the white house saying potus was on medication that made him frisky?
Assume the vp is an imbecile. You don't like him/her very much and don't trust his/her judgement in that the vp has a history of ideological differences with the president. The vp was chosen for the sole purpose of delivering wisconsin in the election.
Would you support the impeachment and removal from office of your favorite president leaving the country in the hands of an imbecile in whom you have no confidence?
Should there be other penalties; financial, administrative or otherwise? Could he be tried in absentia while in office and serve jail time after his term is up.
Are we a NATION OF LAWS, or do you want to acknowledge his transgressions but allow him to continue doing great things, as you see them, for the country?
Edited by hokie at 09:38:36 on 07/19/25