Welcome Guest

the only thing that could have been done

Posted on: April 15, 2021 at 12:38:40 CT

meatiger MU

Posts:

133332

Member For:

26.48 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

is to wage social war on the company, but correct, there would have been no private arbitration group that could have forced the company to sell to the customer (unless there was a contract somewhere).

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

4Tigs.. this is a product of the government you support. - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:25:02

RE: 4Tigs.. this is a product of the government you support. - MOCO SON MU - 4/15 12:31:16

Yes. And if the Equali Act got through, gay activists could - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:34:45

How so? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:26:50

First, without the government there would be no claim. - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:28:07

No system will prevent people from pursuing perceived - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:34:27

Incorrect. In a private law society, there is no claim - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:35:43

what would prevent a frivoulus law suit in a private law - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:40:03

nothing would - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:51:28

you would need to find a court - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:41:43

why would that be difficult? you're dealing with people. not - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:44:49

If there was no relationship between the baker and the gays - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:47:38

there wasn't in our current system either, but here we are. - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:50:10

There are anti discrimination laws - meatiger MU - 4/15 13:10:37

Because government forces involuntary relationships. They - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:54:33

Which is another issue created by government. Those lawsuits - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:43:32

the only thing that could have been done - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:38:40

It would most certainly happen once people entered into a - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:38:35

no. It would not be an involuntary relationship - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:52:26

You're not smart enough to even think beyond the - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:43:50

What I just said would certainly happen - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:45:16

You're forgetting many steps to the example presented before - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:46:55

The many steps all work as long as both sides are in - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:49:42

There is no involuntary element to any of it at all (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:57:45

It isn't involuntary. They participated in contract - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:56:18

The moment an arbitrator rules against them and they say - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 13:05:11

that is incorrect, but you’re hurting “gvmt is voluntary” - pickle MU

- 4/15 13:12:25

involuntary is such a big word - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:56:51

False. You're really, really dumb (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:51:59

you could have stopped after the word "think" (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:44:26

My contention is there never would have been a baker - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:40:16

And any system will at some point force involuntary - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:42:34

No (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:53:17

No, they won't (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:45:26

Explain how it is avoided - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:47:52

false. I don't care to attempt to educate someone unwilling - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:48:53

Here's a nugget to think about. - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:50:53

And if you lose the dispute, again you signed the contract - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:22:18

and if the losing party court shops - pickle MU

- 4/15 13:24:53

And likely loss of future business as competitors become - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:27:12

yes (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 13:29:10

I get it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:50:16

There is no involuntary element whatsoever (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:59:27

LOL, right (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:51:08

Not true. You are forcing the dynamics of a statist - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:44:41

So I I enter into a voluntary contract, and then down the - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:46:45

This was already explained. It is in the interest of both - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:48:40

And that very thing happens now - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:51:48

It's been explained to you many, many times. - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:53:36

Like there is never a dispute - tman MU - 4/15 12:51:07

Who said that? (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:53:56

It's like they don't realize all those things are spelled - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:53:11

Know why? Because government has forced alteration - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:01:09

No, there will be the very same issues in these - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 13:08:57

Courts gave themselves the power to void or alter - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:20:39

or you're just an idiot - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:56:01

There are clearly written clauses to get out of - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:48:18

Cause he keeps inventing reasons that there must be a - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:49:18

If one person refuses to sell to another person - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:39:49

Where do you sue? Government. Courts? - tman MU - 4/15 12:42:04