Just wanting to clarify, because I would be surprised if you actually believe that.
In this post:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16775963 I said:
I will bet that you agree with me & Lincoln (whom I know you hate, but still) that "No man has a right to do what is wrong."
We just draw the line in different places.
You replied:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16776111
no, i don't agree with that, as right and wrong are subjective - which is the point I just made - and that which you are incapable of understanding b/c you live in a world of objective right and wrong defined by your beliefs and want/expect the world to comply and you are happy using gvmt force to do it.
No, Jeff, I don't agree with you nor with Lincoln.
I still think that you would agree that freedom is not a right to do whatever we want, but the ability to do things that are at least not wrong or evil. I realize and understand that we would draw the line as to what is wrong or evil in different places, and that your line would be quite a bit fuzzier and wider than mine, but you still have a line which rightfully sets a limit or boundary on freedoms.
We disagree, of course, on where to draw the line. I think that the line prevents our legitimate freedom from extending to buying, selling & possessing child pornography. You think kiddie porn is well within our freedoms, though you believe the line is still there as it prohibits the production of kiddie porn.
I draw the line at deliberately killing innocent human beings, you draw the line a little further out, perhaps at not killing them beyond 90 days after they have been conceived.
We both have a line limiting freedom. You just don't agree with where I draw it. Your boundaries are further out.