Welcome Guest

Exactly

Posted on: January 21, 2020 at 12:13:20 CT
eatatjoes MU
Posts:
3371
Member For:
20.18 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Partisanship has trumped(pun intended) honesty with this entire thing, with both sides being guilty of it. Why not hear it out?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

          Isn't there a SC justice there who decides what's relevant?(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:24:07
               If both side agree to all a certain witness, the SC would - hokie VT - 1/21 12:32:27
                    Sounds fair enough to me(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:38:01
                         Which is why the socialists and the self righteous dopes - hokie VT - 1/21 12:40:30
     Well, the House made the decision not to call these - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:16:50
          That's a lie. The house called them. Trump made up - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:18:38
               Some of them - not all - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:22:38
                    All of the people on the call to Zelensky were called to - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:32:23
                         Was Bolton called to testify?(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:38:03
                              Yes. And he was blocked(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:38:41
                                   OK - my bad - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:40:23
          that's false. the house called them (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:17:45
     let me rummage through your files and tax records. - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:12:59
          If your employer wanted to do that with your company - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:16:02
               yes. Who's the clowns employer?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:29:19
                    the United States government (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:34:23
          dangerdennis celery(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/21 12:15:34
          All of that is relevant to this case how?(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:14:34
               oooh, you have something to hide, don't ya?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:15:20
     Evidence is what most of us have been asking for - MIZ45 MU - 1/21 12:09:54
          Exactly - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:13:20
     Suppose you were at home and the FIB broke down your - hokie VT - 1/21 12:06:13
          Guess what? I've got 2 dogs AND a cat. You know why? - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:19:33
               WADR, i get tired of the sanctimonious lectures by people - hokie VT - 1/21 12:29:52
                    So you're saying you don't want the truth? Gotcha(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:37:10
                         Yeah, that's what i said. nm - hokie VT - 1/21 12:38:27
                    you're far from objective - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:35:40
               nobody wants the truth - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:27:13
                    Sad, but true(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:27:57
               RE: Guess what? I've got 2 dogs AND a cat. You know why? - scan MU - 1/21 12:21:10
                    True(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:25:04
     That is such a lazy, stupid argument - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 11:58:43
          No, you are wrong - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 12:16:20
               lol damn you're dumb(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:18:06
          It's a simple question, but hardly lazy or stupid - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:11:40
               yes, they view it as being POTUS is a right - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:14:53
                    literally no one said the rules of a criminal investigation - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:17:11
                         look at the reply of your boy, cookie - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:18:46
          The house was blocked from doing it's job - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:00:06
               U seem to be the ultimate fool fool. Fo - yy4u MU - 1/21 12:04:46
               lol no the executive branch exerted its authority - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:03:03
                    Except...he never claimed privilege. He claimed a 100% - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:07:24
                         That's for the supremes to decide - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:08:40
                              Blocking witnesses from testifying after a federal judge - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:09:48
                                   lol no it most certainly is not - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:14:33
     What did the house do? --its their impeachment per Nancy - mu7176grad MU - 1/21 11:58:41
          The House was prohibited by the White house from calling - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/21 12:09:57
               The Senate can only do what the House could do - Sal MU - 1/21 12:24:28
                    Yes, so...the Senate could play a role here. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/21 12:25:21
                         It's not their role to do the House's job (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 12:26:31
               False, they weren’t prohibited at all. - justwinbaby KC - 1/21 12:21:45
     Why give political persecutors anything to spin with lies - TigerMatt STL - 1/21 11:57:14
          What lies will come from witnesses testifying under oath? - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 11:59:39
               Schiff and the media will find a way.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/21 12:01:07
                    you're so full of shyt, god damn (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:01:44
                         tigerfatt is right and u r incredibly losing. Fu tigerfatt. - yy4u MU - 1/21 12:06:18
          Are U.S. Senators not smart enough to figure it out?(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 11:58:04
               The American public is not. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/21 11:58:36
     Because the fact witnesses are damning to Don. Not - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 11:56:10
          should have waited for the courts to decide. - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:14:23
     That wasting time that could be better used for 18(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/21 11:55:34




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard