Welcome Guest

Are U.S. Senators not smart enough to figure it out?(nm)

Posted on: January 21, 2020 at 11:58:04 CT
eatatjoes MU
Posts:
3371
Member For:
20.18 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

          Isn't there a SC justice there who decides what's relevant?(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:24:07
               If both side agree to all a certain witness, the SC would - hokie VT - 1/21 12:32:27
                    Sounds fair enough to me(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:38:01
                         Which is why the socialists and the self righteous dopes - hokie VT - 1/21 12:40:30
     Well, the House made the decision not to call these - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:16:50
          That's a lie. The house called them. Trump made up - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:18:38
               Some of them - not all - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:22:38
                    All of the people on the call to Zelensky were called to - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:32:23
                         Was Bolton called to testify?(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:38:03
                              Yes. And he was blocked(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:38:41
                                   OK - my bad - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/21 12:40:23
          that's false. the house called them (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:17:45
     let me rummage through your files and tax records. - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:12:59
          If your employer wanted to do that with your company - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:16:02
               yes. Who's the clowns employer?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:29:19
                    the United States government (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:34:23
          dangerdennis celery(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/21 12:15:34
          All of that is relevant to this case how?(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:14:34
               oooh, you have something to hide, don't ya?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:15:20
     Evidence is what most of us have been asking for - MIZ45 MU - 1/21 12:09:54
          Exactly - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:13:20
     Suppose you were at home and the FIB broke down your - hokie VT - 1/21 12:06:13
          Guess what? I've got 2 dogs AND a cat. You know why? - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:19:33
               WADR, i get tired of the sanctimonious lectures by people - hokie VT - 1/21 12:29:52
                    So you're saying you don't want the truth? Gotcha(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:37:10
                         Yeah, that's what i said. nm - hokie VT - 1/21 12:38:27
                    you're far from objective - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:35:40
               nobody wants the truth - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:27:13
                    Sad, but true(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:27:57
               RE: Guess what? I've got 2 dogs AND a cat. You know why? - scan MU - 1/21 12:21:10
                    True(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:25:04
     That is such a lazy, stupid argument - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 11:58:43
          No, you are wrong - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 12:16:20
               lol damn you're dumb(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:18:06
          It's a simple question, but hardly lazy or stupid - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 12:11:40
               yes, they view it as being POTUS is a right - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:14:53
                    literally no one said the rules of a criminal investigation - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:17:11
                         look at the reply of your boy, cookie - ashtray UF - 1/21 12:18:46
          The house was blocked from doing it's job - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:00:06
               U seem to be the ultimate fool fool. Fo - yy4u MU - 1/21 12:04:46
               lol no the executive branch exerted its authority - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:03:03
                    Except...he never claimed privilege. He claimed a 100% - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:07:24
                         That's for the supremes to decide - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:08:40
                              Blocking witnesses from testifying after a federal judge - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:09:48
                                   lol no it most certainly is not - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 12:14:33
     What did the house do? --its their impeachment per Nancy - mu7176grad MU - 1/21 11:58:41
          The House was prohibited by the White house from calling - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/21 12:09:57
               The Senate can only do what the House could do - Sal MU - 1/21 12:24:28
                    Yes, so...the Senate could play a role here. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/21 12:25:21
                         It's not their role to do the House's job (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 12:26:31
               False, they weren’t prohibited at all. - justwinbaby KC - 1/21 12:21:45
     Why give political persecutors anything to spin with lies - TigerMatt STL - 1/21 11:57:14
          What lies will come from witnesses testifying under oath? - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 11:59:39
               Schiff and the media will find a way.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/21 12:01:07
                    you're so full of shyt, god damn (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 12:01:44
                         tigerfatt is right and u r incredibly losing. Fu tigerfatt. - yy4u MU - 1/21 12:06:18
          Are U.S. Senators not smart enough to figure it out?(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/21 11:58:04
               The American public is not. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/21 11:58:36
     Because the fact witnesses are damning to Don. Not - MrBlueSky MU - 1/21 11:56:10
          should have waited for the courts to decide. - dangertim MU - 1/21 12:14:23
     That wasting time that could be better used for 18(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/21 11:55:34




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard