Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

If POTUS had sent the aide,

Posted on: December 24, 2019 at 10:24:58 CT
justwinbaby KC
Posts:
20548
Member For:
26.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
In some similar fashion, house dems would call it bribery
For investigations into Hunter Biden.

At some point executive privilege is the law here.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Duffey & those on the email need to testify, right Mitch? - Ace AU - 12/24 09:48:15
     If POTUS had sent the aide, - justwinbaby KC - 12/24 10:24:58
          what executive privilege? can you cite the Constitution - pickle MU - 12/24 11:34:41
          Privilege is not law - Ace AU - 12/24 10:32:18
               Correct, it’s the consequence of the laws - justwinbaby KC - 12/24 17:32:39
               Prove a crime and the Judicial branch will quickly enforce - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 10:36:01
                    Wait - ashtray UF - 12/24 10:39:11
                         You have to cite the crime being investigated - Spanky KU - 12/24 10:46:31
                              Abuse of power is all they have to cite (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/24 10:48:33
                                   You are really not smart at all - Spanky KU - 12/24 10:53:15
                                        you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/24 11:05:51
                                             Nope. I am describing you - Spanky KU - 12/24 11:12:40
                                                  Based on your own failures - ashtray UF - 12/24 11:14:15
                                                       No Ash hat... Based on your ignorance - Spanky KU - 12/24 11:17:14
                                                            More projection (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/24 11:36:13
                                                                 Nope.. Try again - Spanky KU - 12/24 11:45:07
                                                                      Projecting your failures - ashtray UF - 12/24 11:47:13
                                                                           Nope.. just describing you - Spanky KU - 12/24 12:26:39
                                                                                By describing you (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/24 14:06:45
                                                                                     Nope.. Try again - Spanky KU - 12/24 15:51:10
                                        That is a given.(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 10:55:04
                         He claimed that a crime negated Executive Privilege. If - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 10:45:17
                              You continue to confuse criminal procedure with impeachment - ashtray UF - 12/24 10:47:40
                                   nowhere in the constitution does it say a POTUS can be - blake1771 MU - 12/24 12:56:55
                                        high crimes and misdemeanors - pickle MU - 12/24 14:55:52
                                        And where does it address executive privilege? - ashtray UF - 12/24 14:06:22
                                   Makes no difference here HE CLAIMED that a crime negates - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 10:54:16
                                        Incorrect (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/24 11:06:35
     The House presented their case without them, I assume they - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 09:52:51
          The House can Impeach again - Ace AU - 12/24 09:58:47
               The first attempt has been so successful for them why - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 10:02:40
                    RE: The first attempt has been so successful for them why - BH O'bonga MU - 12/24 10:10:22
                    Great concept! - Ace AU - 12/24 10:06:51
                         Then just like the first time the President will decide on - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/24 10:32:53




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard