Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Yes...they went at Bledsoe the whole game and he was...

Posted on: October 13, 2019 at 12:29:40 CT
HSCoach STL
Posts:
4777
Member For:
16.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
They did pick on Bledsoe. He was a bit of weak link, but I’m not sure why he was matched up with their top receiver any way.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Preseason we heard a lot about Acy - Ace AU - 10/13 12:04:33
     Here's your sign - alwaysright MU - 10/13 17:01:24
     The less we hear about CBs, the better(nm) - oleMIZZOU MU - 10/13 12:32:54
     As a CB it’s hard to make an impact when you aren’t - wu-tangtiger MU - 10/13 12:30:48
          There were no INTs yesterday - Ace AU - 10/13 12:39:26
               meant to say almost had one - wu-tangtiger MU - 10/13 12:41:59
                    by Gillespie, on the play where the receiver was held? - Ace AU - 10/13 12:59:20
                         Different play (nm) - wu-tangtiger MU - 10/13 17:02:26
     Yes...they went at Bledsoe the whole game and he was... - BandG MU - 10/13 12:24:49
          RE: Yes...they went at Bledsoe the whole game and he was... - HSCoach STL - 10/13 12:29:40
          he had 3 INTs last year - Ace AU - 10/13 12:29:35
               So(nm) - tman MU - 10/13 12:34:41




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard